Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;25(1):25-37. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0805-0. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
GSTT1 status has been extensively studied as a colorectal cancer risk factor. However, the results are inconsistent. To examine this controversy, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between GSTT1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer.
We performed a literature search using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and HuGNet database to February 2009, with no restrictions. All articles were independent and contained the minimum information necessary to estimate the colorectal cancer risk associated with GSTT1 null. Summary odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect or fixed-effect models based on the heterogeneity of included studies.
A total of 23 case-control studies, including a total of 11,057 subjects (5,058 cases and 5,999 controls), that related to GSTT1 polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer were identified and included for analysis. The random-effect meta-analyses of all the 23 studies suggested that there was a small increased risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with GSTT1 null (OR was 1.23; 95% CI 1.02-1.49; I (2) = 76.9%, P for heterogeneity <0.001). The fixed-effect meta-analyses reached a similar results in Caucasians populations of ten studies (OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.21-1.59; I (2) = 29.8%, P for heterogeneity = 0.171) and Asians populations of five studies (OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.04-1.45; I (2) = 0.0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.428), with as inversely association in the other ethnic populations from four studies (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.877; I (2) = 0.0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.58).
There was a small increased risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with GSTT1 null, especially for Caucasians populations and Asian populations.
GSTT1 状态作为结直肠癌的危险因素已得到广泛研究。然而,结果并不一致。为了检验这一争议,我们进行了荟萃分析以评估 GSTT1 多态性与结直肠癌之间的关系。
我们使用 PUBMED、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 HuGNet 数据库进行了文献检索,检索时间截至 2009 年 2 月,无任何限制。所有文章均为独立研究,包含了评估 GSTT1 缺失与结直肠癌风险相关性所需的最小信息。使用随机效应或固定效应模型,根据纳入研究的异质性,计算汇总比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入了 23 项病例对照研究,总计 11057 例受试者(5058 例病例和 5999 例对照),这些研究均与 GSTT1 多态性和结直肠癌风险相关,并纳入了分析。23 项研究的随机效应荟萃分析表明,GSTT1 缺失个体结直肠癌风险略有增加(OR 为 1.23;95%CI 为 1.02-1.49;I(2)=76.9%,P 值<0.001)。10 项研究的白人人群的固定效应荟萃分析得出了相似的结果(OR=1.39;95%CI 为 1.21-1.59;I(2)=29.8%,P 值=0.171),5 项研究的亚洲人群的结果(OR=1.23;95%CI 为 1.04-1.45;I(2)=0.0%,P 值=0.428)也呈相似趋势,而来自 4 项研究的其他种族人群呈反比关系(OR=0.69;95%CI 为 0.54-0.877;I(2)=0.0%,P 值=0.58)。
GSTT1 缺失个体结直肠癌风险略有增加,特别是白人人群和亚洲人群。