Simon Gregory E, Ludman Evette J, Rutter Carolyn M
Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;66(10):1081-9. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.123.
Effectiveness of organized depression care programs is well established, but dissemination will depend on the balance of benefits and costs.
To estimate the incremental benefit, incremental cost, and net benefit of 2 depression care programs.
Randomized trial comparing 2 interventions with continued usual care, conducted between November 2000 and June 2004.
Seven primary care clinics of a prepaid health care plan in Washington.
Consecutive primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment were invited to a telephone assessment 2 weeks later. Of 634 patients with significant depressive symptoms, 600 consented and were randomized.
The telephone care management intervention included up to 5 outreach calls for monitoring and support, feedback to treating physicians, and care coordination. The care management plus telephone psychotherapy intervention added an 8-session structured cognitive behavioral therapy program with up to 4 additional calls for reinforcement.
Independent, blinded telephone assessments at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months included the Symptom Checklist 90 depression scale. Health services costs were measured using health care plan accounting records.
Over 24 months, telephone care management led to a gain of 29 depression-free days (95% confidence interval, -6 to +63) and a $676 increase in outpatient health care costs (95% confidence interval, $596 lower to $1974 higher). The incremental net benefit was negative even if a day free of depression was valued up to $20. Care management plus psychotherapy led to a gain of 46 depression-free days (95% confidence interval, +12 to +80) and a $397 increase in outpatient costs (95% confidence interval, $882 lower to $1725 higher). The incremental net benefit was positive if a day free of depression was valued at $9 or greater.
Compared with current primary care practice, a structured telephone program including care management and cognitive behavioral psychotherapy has significant clinical benefit with only a modest increase in health services cost.
有组织的抑郁症护理项目的有效性已得到充分证实,但推广将取决于收益与成本的平衡。
评估两个抑郁症护理项目的增量收益、增量成本和净收益。
2000年11月至2004年6月期间进行的一项随机试验,比较两种干预措施与持续常规护理。
华盛顿一个预付医疗保健计划的七家初级保健诊所。
开始接受抗抑郁治疗的连续初级保健患者在两周后被邀请进行电话评估。在634名有明显抑郁症状的患者中,600名同意并被随机分组。
电话护理管理干预包括最多5次外展电话,用于监测和支持、向治疗医生反馈以及护理协调。护理管理加电话心理治疗干预增加了一个为期8节的结构化认知行为治疗项目,最多再增加4次强化电话。
在1、3、6、9、12和18个月时进行独立、盲法电话评估,包括症状自评量表90抑郁量表。使用医疗保健计划会计记录测量卫生服务成本。
在24个月期间,电话护理管理使无抑郁天数增加了29天(95%置信区间,-6至+63),门诊医疗保健成本增加了676美元(95%置信区间,低596美元至高1974美元)。即使将无抑郁的一天价值评估高达20美元,增量净收益仍为负。护理管理加心理治疗使无抑郁天数增加了46天(95%置信区间,+12至+80),门诊成本增加了397美元(95%置信区间,低882美元至高1725美元)。如果将无抑郁的一天价值评估为9美元或更高,增量净收益为正。
与当前的初级保健实践相比,一个包括护理管理和认知行为心理治疗的结构化电话项目具有显著的临床益处,而卫生服务成本仅适度增加。