• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶对需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌及脆弱拟杆菌群的体外研究。

In-vitro studies with ceftazidime against aerobic gram-negative bacilli and Bacteroides fragilis group.

作者信息

Acuna G, Johnston J, Young L S, Martin W J

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:83-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.83.

DOI:10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.83
PMID:19810170
Abstract

The in-vitro susceptibility of recent clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli has been assessed for ceftazidime and compared to amikacin, gentamicin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, cefoperazone, moxalactam, ceftriaxone and ceftizoxime. Using the ICS-WHO agar dilution method, we found that ceftazidime was the most active beta-lactam agent tested against 147 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with a mode MIC=2 mg/l and all but 2% of isolates inhibited at 32 mg/l. 100% of indole-positive and negative Proteus spp., 90% of Citrobacter spp., 100% of Acinetobacter spp. and 98% of Enterobacter spp. were inhibited. A total of 142 isolates from the latter 5 groups of organisms were tested. Cefoperazone and moxalactam were slightly more active by weight than ceftazidime versus Enterobacter spp., but against other Gram-negative bacilli ceftazidime was similar or more potent. Additionally, 72 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group were tested against ceftazidime, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefoxitin. Against these organisms cefoxitin and ceftizoxime were most active. Ceftazidime demonstrates potent in-vitro activity against Ps. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, but it is relatively less active against Bacteroides fragilis group than cefoxitin and ceftizoxime.

摘要

已对近期革兰氏阴性杆菌临床分离株进行了头孢他啶的体外药敏试验,并与阿米卡星、庆大霉素、羧苄西林、哌拉西林、头孢哌酮、拉氧头孢、头孢曲松和头孢唑肟进行了比较。使用国际化学联合会-世界卫生组织琼脂稀释法,我们发现头孢他啶是针对147株铜绿假单胞菌测试的最具活性的β-内酰胺类药物,MIC中位数为2mg/l,除2%的分离株外,所有分离株在32mg/l时均受到抑制。100%的吲哚阳性和阴性变形杆菌属、90%的柠檬酸杆菌属、100%的不动杆菌属和98%的肠杆菌属受到抑制。对后5组生物体的142株分离株进行了测试。头孢哌酮和拉氧头孢相对于肠杆菌属在重量上比头孢他啶略具活性,但对其他革兰氏阴性杆菌,头孢他啶相似或更有效。此外,对72株脆弱拟杆菌属临床分离株进行了头孢他啶、头孢哌酮、头孢唑肟、头孢曲松和头孢西丁的测试。对这些生物体,头孢西丁和头孢唑肟最具活性。头孢他啶对铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科细菌具有强大的体外活性,但相对于头孢西丁和头孢唑肟,它对脆弱拟杆菌属的活性相对较低。

相似文献

1
In-vitro studies with ceftazidime against aerobic gram-negative bacilli and Bacteroides fragilis group.头孢他啶对需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌及脆弱拟杆菌群的体外研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:83-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.83.
2
In-vitro comparison of ceftazidime and nine other antimicrobial agents against hospital strains of Gram-negative bacteria.头孢他啶与其他九种抗菌药物对革兰氏阴性医院菌株的体外比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:53-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.53.
3
In-vitro studies with ceftazidime.头孢他啶的体外研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:73-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.73.
4
The in-vivo antibacterial activity of ceftazidime (Gr 20263)--a comparison with other new beta-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin.头孢他啶(Gr 20263)的体内抗菌活性——与其他新型β-内酰胺类抗生素及庆大霉素的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:247-55. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.247.
5
In-vitro activity of ceftazidime, a beta-lactamase stable cephalosporin.头孢他啶(一种对β-内酰胺酶稳定的头孢菌素)的体外活性
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:131-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.131.
6
Ceftazidime, a pseudomonas-active cephalosporin: in-vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation including recommendations for disc diffusion susceptibility tests.头孢他啶,一种对假单胞菌有效的头孢菌素:体外抗菌活性评估,包括纸片扩散法药敏试验的建议。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:187-211. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.187.
7
In vitro activity of ceftazidime and ceftriaxone.头孢他啶和头孢曲松的体外活性。
Clin Ther. 1983;5(6):603-16.
8
In vitro antibacterial activity of FK037, a novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin.新型胃肠外广谱头孢菌素FK037的体外抗菌活性
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1993 Jan;46(1):71-87. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.46.71.
9
In-vitro activity of ceftazidime compared with other beta-lactam antibiotics.头孢他啶与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素的体外活性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:57-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.57.
10
Susceptibility of gentamicin sensitive and resistant gram negative bacilli to ceftazidime.庆大霉素敏感和耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌对头孢他啶的敏感性
Pathology. 1987 Jul;19(3):274-6. doi: 10.3109/00313028709066562.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainable adsorptive removal of antibiotic residues by chitosan composites: An insight into current developments and future recommendations.壳聚糖复合材料对抗生素残留的可持续吸附去除:当前进展与未来建议洞察
Arab J Chem. 2022 May;15(5):103743. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103743. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
2
The current state of cephalosporin antibiotics: microbiological aspects.头孢菌素类抗生素的现状:微生物学方面
Infection. 1983;11 Suppl 1:S12-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01641098.
3
Piperacillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.
哌拉西林。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1984 Nov;28(5):375-425. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198428050-00002.
4
Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.头孢曲松。对其抗菌活性、药理特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1984 Jun;27(6):469-527. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198427060-00001.
5
Ceftizoxime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.头孢唑肟:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途综述
Drugs. 1985 Apr;29(4):281-329. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198529040-00001.
6
Ceftazidime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.头孢他啶。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1985 Feb;29(2):105-61. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198529020-00002.
7
Ceftriaxone. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and an update on its therapeutic use with particular reference to once-daily administration.头孢曲松。对其抗菌活性和药代动力学特性的重新评估,以及关于其治疗用途的最新情况,特别提及每日一次给药。
Drugs. 1988 Jun;35(6):604-45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835060-00002.