Brogden R N, Ward A
ADIS Drug Information Services, Auckland.
Drugs. 1988 Jun;35(6):604-45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835060-00002.
Since ceftriaxone was first reviewed in the Journal, further studies have confirmed its broad antibacterial spectrum in vitro and extended its clinical documentation in comparative studies with other widely used drugs in infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tract, meningitis in infants and children, uncomplicated gonorrhoea, perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery, and in several other types of infection. As in earlier studies, which primarily used a twice-daily dosage regimen, few significant differences were found between therapeutic groups in comparative studies and results have demonstrated the efficacy of once-daily ceftriaxone in all but the most serious infections, such as sole antibiotic therapy in pseudomonal infections. Wider clinical experience has established that ceftriaxone is generally well tolerated. Thus, ceftriaxone now has a well-defined place as an appropriate alternative for the parenteral treatment of a variety of infections due to susceptible organisms, as well as for perioperative prophylaxis of surgery, and may offer advantages of greater convenience over other parenteral antibiotics which are administered more frequently.
自从头孢曲松首次在本刊发表综述以来,进一步的研究已证实其在体外具有广泛的抗菌谱,并在与其他广泛用于泌尿道和下呼吸道感染、婴幼儿脑膜炎、非复杂性淋病、手术患者围手术期预防以及其他几种感染类型的药物的对比研究中扩展了其临床应用记录。与早期主要采用每日两次给药方案的研究一样,在对比研究中各治疗组之间几乎未发现显著差异,结果表明,除了最严重的感染(如假单胞菌感染的单一抗生素治疗)外,每日一次的头孢曲松在所有感染中均有效。更广泛的临床经验表明,头孢曲松通常耐受性良好。因此,头孢曲松现在已明确成为治疗各种易感菌感染以及手术围手术期预防的合适替代药物,并且与其他需要更频繁给药的注射用抗生素相比,可能具有更大的便利性优势。