Suppr超能文献

用于治疗月经过多的口服避孕药。

Oral contraceptive pill for heavy menstrual bleeding.

作者信息

Farquhar Cindy, Brown Julie

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, FMHS Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD000154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000154.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) is a benign yet debilitating social and health condition. Treatments prescribed in order to reduce excessive menstrual blood loss include prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, antifibrinolytics, the oral contraceptive pill and other hormones. The combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is claimed to have a variety of beneficial, inducing a regular shedding of a thinner endometrium and inhibiting ovulation thus having the effect of treating menorrhagia and providing contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills compared with other medical therapies, placebo or no therapy in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (search dates: Oct 1996, May 2002, June 2004, April 2006 and June 2009) for all publications which describe randomised trials of OCP for the treatment of menorrhagia. This register is based on regular searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, the hand searching of 20 relevant journals and conference proceedings, and searches of several key grey literature sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled comparisons of OCP versus other medical therapies, placebo or no treatment for the treatment of menorrhagia. Women of reproductive years with regular heavy periods, measured either objectively or subjectively and greater than, or equal to, two months follow up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All assessments of trial quality and data extraction were performed unblinded by at least two reviewers. Only one trial of 45 women met the inclusion criteria and none were excluded.

MAIN RESULTS

As the trial used a cross-over design, only data from the first treatment period (cycles three and four) were analysed. The results from all the three mefenamic acid groups were combined. There was no significant difference in menstrual blood loss (MBL) between those women treated with the OCP and danazol, mefenamic acid or naproxen.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: One small study found no significant difference between groups treated with OCP, mefenamic acid, low dose danazol or naproxen. Overall, the evidence from the one study is not sufficient to adequately assess the effectiveness of OCP.This review was unable to achieve its stated objectives because of the paucity of the data.

摘要

背景

月经过多(月经量过多)是一种良性但使人衰弱的社会和健康状况。为减少过多月经失血而开的治疗方法包括前列腺素合成酶抑制剂、抗纤溶剂、口服避孕药和其他激素。复方口服避孕药(OCP)据称有多种益处,可促使较薄的子宫内膜有规律地脱落并抑制排卵,从而起到治疗月经过多和提供避孕的作用。

目的

确定口服避孕药与其他药物疗法、安慰剂或不治疗相比在治疗月经过多方面的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了月经失调与生育力低下组试验注册库(检索日期:1996年10月、2002年5月、2004年6月、2006年4月和2009年6月),以查找所有描述OCP治疗月经过多随机试验的出版物。该注册库基于定期检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、PsycINFO、手工检索20种相关期刊和会议论文集,以及检索几个关键的灰色文献来源。

选择标准

所有OCP与其他药物疗法、安慰剂或不治疗用于治疗月经过多的随机对照比较。有规律月经量过多的育龄妇女,月经量通过客观或主观测量,且随访时间大于或等于两个月。

数据收集与分析

至少两名评审员在不设盲的情况下进行所有试验质量评估和数据提取。只有一项纳入45名妇女的试验符合纳入标准,且无一被排除。

主要结果

由于该试验采用交叉设计,仅分析了第一个治疗期(第3和第4周期)的数据。将所有三个甲芬那酸组的结果合并。接受OCP治疗的妇女与接受达那唑、甲芬那酸或萘普生治疗的妇女在月经失血量(MBL)方面无显著差异。

作者结论

一项小型研究发现,接受OCP、甲芬那酸、低剂量达那唑或萘普生治疗的组间无显著差异。总体而言,该研究的证据不足以充分评估OCP的有效性。由于数据匮乏,本综述未能实现其既定目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验