Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regency Specialist Hospital, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 26;8(8):CD006034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006034.pub3.
Heavy menstrual bleeding and pain are common reasons women discontinue intrauterine device (IUD) use. Copper IUD (Cu IUD) users tend to experience increased menstrual bleeding, whereas levonorgestrel IUD (LNG IUD) users tend to have irregular menstruation. Medical therapies used to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with Cu and LNG IUD use include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anti-fibrinolytics and paracetamol. We analysed treatment and prevention interventions separately because the expected outcomes for treatment and prevention interventions differ. We did not combine different drug classes in the analysis as they have different mechanisms of action. This is an update of a review originally on NSAIDs. The review scope has been widened to include all interventions for treatment or prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD use.
To evaluate all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed strategies for treatment and prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD use, for example, pharmacotherapy and alternative therapies.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to January 2021.
We included RCTs in any language that tested strategies for treatment or prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD (Cu IUD, LNG IUD or other IUD) use. The comparison could be no intervention, placebo or another active intervention.
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were volume of menstrual blood loss, duration of menstruation and painful menstruation. We used a random-effects model in all meta-analyses. Review authors assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
This review includes 21 trials involving 3689 participants from middle- and high-income countries. Women were 18 to 45 years old and either already using an IUD or had just had one placed for contraception. The included trials examined NSAIDs and other interventions. Eleven were treatment trials, of these seven were on users of the Cu IUD, one on LNG IUD and three on an unknown type. Ten were prevention trials, six focused on Cu IUD users, and four on LNG IUD users. Sixteen trials had high risk of detection bias due to subjective assessment of pain and bleeding. Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding Cu IUD Vitamin B1 resulted in fewer pads used per day (mean difference (MD) -7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.50 to -5.50) and fewer bleeding days (MD -2.00, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.62; 1 trial; 110 women; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of naproxen on the volume of menstruation compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.78; 1 trial, 40 women; very low-certainty evidence). Treatment with mefenamic acid resulted in less volume of blood loss compared to tranexamic acid (MD -64.26, 95% CI -105.65 to -22.87; 1 trial, 94 women; low-certainty evidence). However, there was no difference in duration of bleeding with treatment of mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid (MD 0.08 days, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.42, 2 trials, 152 women; low-certainty evidence). LNG IUD The use of ulipristal acetate in LNG IUD may not reduce the number of bleeding days in 90 days in comparison to placebo (MD -9.30 days, 95% CI -26.76 to 8.16; 1 trial, 24 women; low-certainty evidence). Unknown IUD type Mefenamic acid may not reduce volume of bleeding compared to Vitex agnus measured by pictorial blood assessment chart (MD -2.40, 95% CI -13.77 to 8.97; 1 trial; 84 women; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of pain Cu IUD Treatment with tranexamic acid and sodium diclofenac may result in little or no difference in the occurrence of pain (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.25; 1 trial, 38 women; very low-certainty evidence). Unknown IUD type Naproxen may reduce pain (MD 4.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 7.29; 1 trial, 33 women; low-certainty evidence). Prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding Cu IUD We found very low-certainty evidence that tolfenamic acid may prevent heavy bleeding compared to placebo (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85; 1 trial, 310 women). There was no difference between ibuprofen and placebo in blood volume reduction (MD -14.11, 95% CI -36.04 to 7.82) and duration of bleeding (MD -0.2 days, 95% CI -1.40 to 1.0; 1 trial, 28 women, low-certainty evidence). Aspirin may not prevent heavy bleeding in comparison to paracetamol (MD -0.30, 95% CI -26.16 to 25.56; 1 trial, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). LNG IUD Ulipristal acetate may increase the percentage of bleeding days compared to placebo (MD 9.50, 95% CI 1.48 to 17.52; 1 trial, 118 women; low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient data for analysis in a single trial comparing mifepristone and vitamin B. There were insufficient data for analysis in the single trial comparing tranexamic acid and mefenamic acid and in another trial comparing naproxen with estradiol. Prevention of pain Cu IUD There was low-certainty evidence that tolfenamic acid may not be effective to prevent painful menstruation compared to placebo (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.14; 1 trial, 310 women). Ibuprofen may not reduce menstrual cramps compared to placebo (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 8.95; 1 trial, 20 women, low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review should be interpreted with caution due to low- and very low-certainty evidence. Included trials were limited; the majority of the evidence was derived from single trials with few participants. Further research requires larger trials and improved trial reporting. The use of vitamin B1 and mefenamic acid to treat heavy menstruation and tolfenamic acid to prevent heavy menstruation associated with Cu IUD should be investigated. More trials are needed to generate evidence for the treatment and prevention of heavy and painful menstruation associated with LNG IUD.
经量过多和疼痛是导致女性停止使用宫内节育器(IUD)的常见原因。使用含铜宫内节育器(Cu IUD)的女性往往会经历经量增加,而使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG IUD)的女性往往会出现月经不规则。用于减少与 Cu 和 LNG IUD 使用相关的经量过多或疼痛的医学疗法包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、抗纤溶药和对乙酰氨基酚。我们分别分析了治疗和预防干预措施,因为这两种干预措施的预期结果不同。由于它们具有不同的作用机制,我们没有将不同的药物类别合并在分析中。这是对最初关于 NSAIDs 的综述的更新。综述范围已扩大到包括所有用于治疗或预防与 IUD 使用相关的经量过多或疼痛的干预措施。
评估所有评估治疗和预防与 IUD(Cu IUD、LNG IUD 或其他 IUD)使用相关的经量过多或疼痛的策略的随机对照试验(RCT),例如,药物治疗和替代疗法。
我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 以获取截至 2021 年 1 月的文献。
我们纳入了任何语言的 RCT,这些 RCT 测试了与 IUD(Cu IUD、LNG IUD 或其他 IUD)使用相关的经量过多或疼痛的治疗或预防策略。比较可以是无干预、安慰剂或另一种活性干预。
两名综述作者独立评估试验的纳入和偏倚风险,并提取数据。主要结局是经血量、经期持续时间和经期疼痛。我们在所有的 meta 分析中都使用了随机效应模型。综述作者使用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性。
本综述纳入了 21 项涉及中高收入国家的 3689 名参与者的试验。女性年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间,要么已经使用了 IUD,要么刚刚放置了 IUD 用于避孕。纳入的试验研究了 NSAIDs 和其他干预措施。11 项是治疗试验,其中 7 项是针对 Cu IUD 用户的,1 项是针对 LNG IUD 用户的,3 项是针对未知类型的用户的。10 项是预防试验,其中 6 项针对 Cu IUD 用户,4 项针对 LNG IUD 用户。由于对疼痛和出血的主观评估,有 16 项试验存在高检测偏倚风险。维生素 B1 治疗 Cu IUD 引起的经量过多可减少每天使用的护垫数量(MD -7.00,95%置信区间(CI)-8.50 至 -5.50)和出血天数(MD -2.00,95% CI -2.38 至 -1.62;1 项试验;110 名女性;低确定性证据)与安慰剂相比。与安慰剂相比,萘普生对月经量的影响的证据非常不确定(比值比(OR)0.09,95%置信区间(CI)0.00 至 1.78;1 项试验,40 名女性;非常低确定性证据)。与氨甲环酸相比,甲芬那酸治疗可导致出血量减少(MD -64.26,95% CI -105.65 至 -22.87;1 项试验,94 名女性;低确定性证据)。然而,甲芬那酸或氨甲环酸治疗对出血时间没有影响(MD 0.08 天,95% CI -0.27 至 0.42,2 项试验,152 名女性;低确定性证据)。LNG IUD 左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器可能不会减少 90 天内的出血天数与安慰剂相比(MD -9.30 天,95% CI -26.76 至 8.16;1 项试验,24 名女性;低确定性证据)。未知 IUD 类型甲芬那酸与 Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart 相比,可能不会减少出血量(MD -2.40,95% CI -13.77 至 8.97;1 项试验;84 名女性;低确定性证据)。
治疗疼痛 Cu IUD 与安慰剂相比,氨甲环酸和双氯芬酸钠治疗可能不会导致疼痛的发生率有很大或无差异(OR 1.00,95% CI 0.06 至 17.25;1 项试验,38 名女性;非常低确定性证据)。未知 IUD 类型萘普生可能会减轻疼痛(MD 4.10,95% CI 0.91 至 7.29;1 项试验,33 名女性;低确定性证据)。
预防经量过多 Cu IUD 我们发现托芬那酸可能与安慰剂相比预防经量过多的证据非常低(OR 0.54,95% CI 0.34 至 0.85;1 项试验,310 名女性)。与安慰剂相比,布洛芬在减少出血量(MD -14.11,95% CI -36.04 至 7.82)和经期持续时间(MD -0.2 天,95% CI -1.40 至 1.0;1 项试验,28 名女性,低确定性证据)方面没有差异。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,阿司匹林可能无法预防经量过多(MD -0.30,95% CI -26.16 至 25.56;1 项试验,20 名女性;非常低确定性证据)。LNG IUD 左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器可能会导致出血天数比安慰剂增加(MD 9.50,95% CI 1.48 至 17.52;1 项试验,118 名女性;低确定性证据)。由于单一试验比较米非司酮和维生素 B 的数据分析不足,因此无法进行分析。由于单一试验比较氨甲环酸和甲芬那酸以及另一个试验比较萘普生和雌二醇的数据不足,因此无法进行分析。
预防疼痛 Cu IUD 与安慰剂相比,托芬那酸可能无法有效预防经痛的证据为低确定性(OR 0.71,95% CI 0.44 至 1.14;1 项试验,310 名女性)。与安慰剂相比,布洛芬可能不会减少经期痉挛(OR 1.00,95% CI 0.11 至 8.95;1 项试验,20 名女性,低确定性证据)。
由于低确定性和非常低确定性证据,应该谨慎解释本综述的研究结果。纳入的试验有限;大多数证据来自于样本量较小的单一试验。需要进一步的研究来生成与 Cu IUD 相关的经量过多和疼痛的治疗和预防以及与 LNG IUD 相关的经量过多和疼痛的治疗和预防的证据。应该研究使用维生素 B1 和甲芬那酸治疗经量过多以及使用托芬那酸预防 Cu IUD 相关的经量过多。需要更多的试验来生成与 LNG IUD 相关的经量过多和疼痛的治疗和预防的证据。