Michalczuk Rosanna, Mitchell Amy
Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Institute of Mental Health, Gateway Building, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2TU.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD007626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007626.pub2.
There is evidence suggesting that people with serious mental illness are less responsive to everyday social rewards such as praise. Motivation and performance in social situations can be poor. Rewarding of tasks with money improves motivation to complete the tasks in everyday life. Careful use of targeted monetary rewards could also help people with troublesome symptoms of schizophrenia.
To assess the effect of monetary incentive/rewards for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illness.
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 2008).
All relevant randomised controlled trials comparing monetary rewards with standard care or no monetary rewards.
Working independently, we selected studies for quality assessment and extracted relevant data. We analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Where possible and appropriate we calculated the Relative Risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous data we calculated weighted mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals.
Five trials are excluded that investigate one type of monetary reward over another and may be included in a future update. We did include one study, carried out over 40 years ago, randomising a total of 25 very chronically ill people who had been in hospital an average of 20 years. The targeted task that was being encouraged was assembly of dolls. People allocated to the payment group produced less dolls than those not paid at all although this difference did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance (MD -0.80 CI -1.44 to -0.16).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Monetary rewards have been the topic for sporadic evaluative research for decades and this review shows that randomised studies are possible. We suggest a design for a future informative trial.
有证据表明,患有严重精神疾病的人对日常社交奖励(如赞扬)的反应较弱。在社交场合中的动机和表现可能较差。用金钱奖励任务可以提高日常生活中完成任务的动机。谨慎使用有针对性的金钱奖励也可能有助于患有精神分裂症棘手症状的人。
评估金钱激励/奖励对精神分裂症或精神分裂症样疾病患者的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组登记册(2008年6月)。
所有比较金钱奖励与标准护理或无金钱奖励的相关随机对照试验。
我们独立工作,选择研究进行质量评估并提取相关数据。我们按意向性分析原则进行分析。在可能且合适的情况下,我们计算相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续性数据,我们计算加权平均差(MD)及其95%置信区间。
排除了5项研究,这些研究调查的是一种金钱奖励与另一种金钱奖励的比较,可能会纳入未来的更新中。我们确实纳入了一项40多年前进行的研究,该研究共随机分配了25名长期患病的患者,他们平均住院20年。所鼓励的目标任务是组装玩偶。分配到付费组的人组装的玩偶比未付费组的人少,尽管这种差异未达到传统的统计学显著水平(MD -0.80,CI -1.44至-0.16)。
几十年来,金钱奖励一直是零星评估研究的主题,本综述表明随机研究是可行的。我们建议为未来的信息性试验设计一个方案。