Suppr超能文献

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验草药疗法治疗哮喘儿童。

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of herbal therapy for children with asthma.

机构信息

1 Department of Community & Family Medicine, School of Public Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Oct;15(10):1091-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0626.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate whether the herbal formula of CUF2 used as complementary therapy improves the clinical symptoms and biochemical markers in children with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective trial, 85 children with asthma aged 7-15 years were randomly assigned to receive either a daily oral herbal formula of 0.619-g CUF2 capsule of dried aqueous extract with an equal weight of five herbs (Astragalus mongholius Bunge, Cordyceps sinensis Sacc., Radix stemonae, Bulbus fritillariae cirrhosae, and Radix scutellariae) or placebo for 6 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the change in steroids dosage; the secondary outcomes included the disease severity score, lung function test, and biochemical markers in blood. Eighty-five (85) children (42 on active treatment and 43 on placebo) completed the 6-month clinical trial. Children randomized to the herbal formula of CUF2 and the placebo showed a similar improvement in clinical symptoms and biomedical markers. The comparison between the CUF2 group and the placebo group showed no significant difference on the dosage of steroids (-2.3 versus -3.1 mg, p = 0.915), disease severity score (-2.3 versus -3.1, p = 0.215), and lung function test of forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity percent (0.1 versus 0.6%, p = 0.809) and peak expiratory flow rate (-7.3 versus -0.6 l/minutes, p = 0.118). No significant difference was found between the two study groups in the biochemical outcomes measured. The intervention effect of CUF2 was smaller than the placebo effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides no evidence to support the use of the herbal formula of CUF2 in children with asthma. Parents are thus advised to discuss with health professionals before choosing an herbal formula in preference to conventional treatment modes.

摘要

目的

本试验旨在评估作为辅助疗法的草药配方 CUF2 是否能改善接受吸入皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘儿童的临床症状和生化标志物。

患者和方法

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照的前瞻性试验中,85 名年龄在 7-15 岁的哮喘儿童被随机分为两组,分别接受每日口服草药配方(干水提物 0.619g 的 CUF2 胶囊,含 5 种草药等重)或安慰剂,疗程 6 个月。

结果

主要终点是皮质类固醇剂量的变化;次要终点包括疾病严重程度评分、肺功能检查和血液生化标志物。85 名(42 名接受活性治疗,43 名接受安慰剂)儿童完成了 6 个月的临床试验。接受 CUF2 草药配方和安慰剂治疗的儿童在临床症状和生物医学标志物方面均有类似改善。与安慰剂组相比,CUF2 组的皮质类固醇剂量(-2.3 与-3.1mg,p=0.915)、疾病严重程度评分(-2.3 与-3.1,p=0.215)、1 秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量百分比(0.1 与 0.6%,p=0.809)和呼气峰流速(-7.3 与-0.6L/min,p=0.118)均无显著差异。两组间生化指标测量也无显著差异。CUF2 的干预效果小于安慰剂效果。

结论

本研究没有证据支持在哮喘儿童中使用 CUF2 草药配方。因此,建议家长在选择草药配方前与卫生专业人员讨论,以避免替代传统治疗模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验