Suppr超能文献

促进有效使用避孕套的干预措施的随机对照试验的系统评价。

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions promoting effective condom use.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Feb;65(2):100-10. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.085456. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective condom use can prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unwanted pregnancy. We conducted a systematic review and methodological appraisal of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to promote effective condom use.

METHODS

We searched for all RCTs of interventions to promote effective condom use using the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group's trials register (Oct 2006), CENTRAL (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to Oct 2006), EMBASE (1974 to Oct 2006), LILACS (1982 to Oct 2006), IBSS (1951 to Oct 2006) and Psychinfo (1996 to Oct 2006). We extracted data on allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, loss to follow-up and measures of effect. Effect estimates were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 139 trials. Seven out of ten trials reported reductions in 'any STI' with five statistically significant results. Three out of four trials reported reductions in pregnancy, although none was statistically significant. Only four trials met all the quality criteria. Trials reported a median of 11 (IQR 7-17) outcome measures. Few trials used the same outcome measure. Altogether, 10 trials (7%) used the outcome 'any STI', 4 (3%) self-reported pregnancy and 22 (16%) used 'condom use at last sex'.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are generally consistent with modest benefits but there is considerable potential for bias due to poor trial quality. Because of the low proportion of trials using the same outcome the potential for bias from selective reporting of outcomes is considerable. Despite the public health importance of increasing condom use there is little reliable evidence on the effectiveness of condom promotion interventions.

摘要

背景

有效的避孕套使用可以预防性传播感染(STIs)和意外怀孕。我们对促进有效避孕套使用的干预措施进行了系统评价和方法学评估。

方法

我们使用 Cochrane 传染病组试验登记处(2006 年 10 月)、CENTRAL(第 4 期,2006 年)、MEDLINE(1966 年至 2006 年 10 月)、EMBASE(1974 年至 2006 年 10 月)、LILACS(1982 年至 2006 年 10 月)和 IBSS(1951 年至 2006 年 10 月)以及 Psychinfo(1996 年至 2006 年 10 月)搜索了所有促进有效避孕套使用的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCTs)。我们提取了关于分配序列、分配隐匿、盲法、随访丢失和效果测量的信息。计算了效应估计值。

结果

我们确定了 139 项试验。十项试验中有七项报告了“任何 STI”的减少,其中五项具有统计学意义。四项试验中有三项报告了怀孕的减少,尽管没有一项具有统计学意义。只有四项试验符合所有质量标准。试验报告的中位数为 11 项(IQR 7-17)结果测量。很少有试验使用相同的结果测量。总的来说,有 10 项试验(7%)使用了“任何 STI”的结果,4 项(3%)报告了自我报告的怀孕,22 项(16%)使用了“最后一次性行为时使用避孕套”的结果。

结论

结果总体上与适度的益处一致,但由于试验质量较差,存在相当大的偏倚风险。由于使用相同结果的试验比例较低,因此结果选择性报告的偏倚风险相当大。尽管增加避孕套使用的公共卫生意义重大,但关于促进避孕套使用的干预措施的有效性的可靠证据很少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6525/3009845/8e49564d5962/jech85456fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验