• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[住院抑郁症治疗中无反应的风险因素]

[Risk factors for non-response in inpatient depression treatment].

作者信息

Hölzel Lars, Wolff Alessa von, Kriston Levente, Härter Martin

机构信息

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Sektion Klinische Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 2010 Jan;37(1):27-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223348. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1223348
PMID:19823968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of non-response in inpatient depression treatment by means of routinely collected data from 10 psychiatric clinics.

METHODS

Evaluation was carried out through univariate analyses first; subsequently a model was developed by means of multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

About one third (31.5 %) of the 511 patients included in the study was classified as non-responder. Concerning patient level, psychic comorbidity, severity of depression symptoms and serious impairment of lifestyle as indication for hospitalisation have an impact on treatment outcome. In contrast, socio-demographic characteristics are not suitable as predictors. On the level of process characteristics, psychotherapy and patient compliance to medication enhanced the chance of profiting from inpatient treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results can be integrated into a well interpretable model of the current inpatient depression treatment. Non-response is not yet sufficiently predictable through routine data.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过从10家精神科诊所常规收集的数据,确定住院抑郁症治疗中无反应的预测因素。

方法

首先通过单变量分析进行评估;随后通过多变量分析建立一个模型。

结果

纳入研究的511名患者中约三分之一(31.5%)被归类为无反应者。在患者层面,精神共病、抑郁症状的严重程度以及作为住院指征的生活方式严重受损对治疗结果有影响。相比之下,社会人口学特征不适合作为预测因素。在治疗过程特征层面,心理治疗和患者对药物治疗的依从性增加了从住院治疗中获益的机会。

结论

这些结果可以整合到一个易于解释的当前住院抑郁症治疗模型中。通过常规数据尚不能充分预测无反应情况。

相似文献

1
[Risk factors for non-response in inpatient depression treatment].[住院抑郁症治疗中无反应的风险因素]
Psychiatr Prax. 2010 Jan;37(1):27-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223348. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
2
Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and follow-up among patients with major depressive disorders.重度抑郁症患者的早期变化模式及其与结局和随访的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Nov;118(1-3):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
3
[Residual symptoms after a treated major depressive disorder: in practice ambulatory observatory carried out of city].[重度抑郁症治疗后的残留症状:在城市进行的门诊观察实践]
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):438-44.
4
Symptoms of anxiety in depression: assessment of item performance of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in patients with depression.抑郁症中的焦虑症状:汉密尔顿焦虑量表在抑郁症患者中的条目性能评估
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):1006-13. doi: 10.1002/da.20435.
5
Clinically significant change in psychotherapy for depressive disorders.抑郁症心理治疗中的临床显著变化。
J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
6
Identifying patients at risk of complete nonresponse in the outpatient treatment of depression.识别抑郁症门诊治疗中完全无反应风险的患者。
Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(6):358-64. doi: 10.1159/000151389. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
7
Major depression: the importance of clinical characteristics and treatment response to prognosis.重度抑郁症:临床特征及治疗反应对预后的重要性。
Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/da.20613.
8
[Gerontopsychiatry versus general psychiatry in the inpatient treatment in late-life depression].
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Sep;36(6):270-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090257. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
9
Prediction of response to ECT with routinely collected data in major depression.
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.03.008.
10
Which factors are important predictors of non-recovery from major depression? A 2-year prospective observational study.哪些因素是重度抑郁症无法康复的重要预测指标?一项为期两年的前瞻性观察研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(5):410-6. doi: 10.1080/08039480600937801.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpersonal Change During Inpatient CBASP Treatment: Focus on Group Therapy.住院期间CBASP治疗中的人际变化:聚焦团体治疗。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 26;12:620037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620037. eCollection 2021.
2
[Patients with ICD-10 disorders F3 and F4 in psychiatric and psychosomatic in-patient units - who is treated where? : Allocation features from the PfAD study].[精神科和身心科住院部患有国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)中F3和F4类疾病的患者——谁在何处接受治疗?:PfAD研究的分配特征]
Nervenarzt. 2017 Jan;88(1):61-69. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-0058-9.
3
Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care.
住院抑郁症护理中的治疗模式。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Mar;25(1):55-67. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1487. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
The INDDEP study: inpatient and day hospital treatment for depression - symptom course and predictors of change.INDDEP 研究:抑郁症的住院和日间医院治疗 - 症状过程和变化的预测因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Mar 26;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-100.