• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替考拉宁与头孢拉定及甲硝唑在外科预防用药中的比较:一项中期分析。

A comparison of teicoplanin vs. cephradine and metronidazole in surgical prophylaxis: an interim analysis.

作者信息

Antrum R, Gorst K, Galvin K, Thornton C, Wynne K, Malata C, Ramsden C, Kester R, Harding I

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:45-53.

PMID:1982576
Abstract

The preliminary results of a trial to examine and compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a single dose of teicoplanin with three doses of cephradine combined with metronidazole are presented in a series of 113 patients undergoing elective vascular surgery. There were no obvious differences in the infection rates and sepsis indicators in either group. Neither drug regimen produced any evidence of renal or hepatic damage, though the levels of three hepatocellular enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT), were seen to be transiently elevated, peaking 7 days post-operatively. The trial continues.

摘要

一项针对113例接受择期血管手术患者的试验给出了初步结果,该试验旨在检验并比较单剂量替考拉宁与三剂量头孢拉定联合甲硝唑的安全性、耐受性及疗效。两组的感染率和败血症指标均无明显差异。两种药物治疗方案均未出现任何肾或肝损伤的迹象,不过三种肝细胞酶,即天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)的水平出现了短暂升高,在术后7天达到峰值。试验仍在继续。

相似文献

1
A comparison of teicoplanin vs. cephradine and metronidazole in surgical prophylaxis: an interim analysis.替考拉宁与头孢拉定及甲硝唑在外科预防用药中的比较:一项中期分析。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:45-53.
2
Teicoplanin vs cephradine and metronidazole in the prophylaxis of sepsis following vascular surgery: an interim analysis of an ongoing trial.替考拉宁与头孢拉定及甲硝唑预防血管手术后败血症的比较:一项正在进行的试验的中期分析
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1992(567):43-6.
3
A comparison of teicoplanin versus cephradine plus metronidazole in the prophylaxis of post-operative infection in vascular surgery.替考拉宁与头孢拉定加甲硝唑在血管外科手术术后感染预防中的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Mar;41(3):233-43. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90022-1.
4
Metronidazole prophylaxis against wound infection in patients undergoing appendicectomy.
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1981;70(2):71-4.
5
Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan in elective abdominal surgery. A controlled trial.
Chemioterapia. 1988 Aug;7(4):218-22.
6
["Single shot" prevention in abdominal surgery. Antibiotics with long half-life (ceftriaxone, ornidazole) vs. antibiotics with short half-life (cefazolin, metronidazole, clindamycin)].腹部手术中的“单次给药”预防。长半衰期抗生素(头孢曲松、奥硝唑)与短半衰期抗生素(头孢唑林、甲硝唑、克林霉素)的对比
Helv Chir Acta. 1994 Apr;60(4):483-8.
7
Wound prophylaxis with metronidazole in head and neck surgical oncology.甲硝唑在头颈部肿瘤外科手术中的伤口预防
Laryngoscope. 1988 Aug;98(8 Pt 1):803-6. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198808000-00001.
8
Preventing anaerobic infection in surgery of the colon.预防结肠手术中的厌氧菌感染。
Can J Surg. 1981 Mar;24(2):139-41, 184.
9
[Perioperative use of ampicillin/sulbactam, cefoxitin and piperacillin/ metronidazole in elective colon and rectal surgery. A prospective randomized quality assurance study of 422 patients].[氨苄西林/舒巴坦、头孢西丁和哌拉西林/甲硝唑在择期结肠和直肠手术围手术期的应用。一项对422例患者的前瞻性随机质量保证研究]
Chirurg. 1993 Aug;64(8):649-52.
10
Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital.在一家地区综合医院对接受择期结直肠手术患者使用两种预防性单剂量静脉注射抗生素方案的比较。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1989 Aug;34(4):208-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction.主动脉或主-髂动脉周围动脉重建术中的感染预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD015192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015192.pub2.
2
Prevention of infection in arterial reconstruction.动脉重建术中的感染预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003073.pub2.