Wyss T R, Dick F, England A, Brown L C, Rodway A D, Greenhalgh R M
Vascular Surgery Research Group, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, United Kingdom.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;38(6):724-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
The aim of this study was to establish and validate a three-dimensional imaging protocol for the assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scans of abdominal aortic aneurysms in UK EVAR trials patients. Quality control and repeatability of anatomical measurements is important for the validity of any core laboratory.
Three different observers performed anatomical measurements on 50 preoperative CT scans of aortic aneurysms using the Vitrea 2 three-dimensional post-imaging software in a core laboratory setting. We assessed the accuracy of intra and inter observer repeatability of measurements, the time required for collection of measurements, 3 different levels of automation and 3 different automated criteria for measurement of neck length.
None of the automated neck length measurements demonstrated sufficient accuracy and it was necessary to perform checking of the important automated landmarks. Good intra and limited inter observer agreement were achieved with three-dimensional assessment. Complete assessment of the aneurysm and iliacs took an average (SD) of 17.2 (4.1) minutes.
Aortic aneurysm anatomy can be assessed reliably and quickly using three-dimensional assessment but for scans of limited quality, manual checking of important landmarks remains necessary. Using a set protocol, agreement between observers is satisfactory but not as good as within observers.
本研究的目的是建立并验证一种三维成像方案,用于评估英国腔内修复治疗腹主动脉瘤试验(EVAR)患者的腹部主动脉瘤计算机断层扫描(CT)。解剖测量的质量控制和可重复性对于任何核心实验室的有效性都很重要。
在核心实验室环境中,三名不同的观察者使用Vitrea 2三维成像后处理软件对50例主动脉瘤术前CT扫描进行解剖测量。我们评估了测量的观察者内和观察者间重复性的准确性、收集测量所需的时间、3种不同程度的自动化以及3种不同的测量颈部长度的自动化标准。
所有自动化颈部长度测量均未显示出足够的准确性,因此有必要对重要的自动标记进行检查。三维评估实现了良好的观察者内一致性和有限的观察者间一致性。对动脉瘤和髂动脉的完整评估平均(标准差)耗时17.2(4.1)分钟。
使用三维评估可以可靠且快速地评估主动脉瘤解剖结构,但对于质量有限的扫描,仍有必要手动检查重要标记。使用固定方案时,观察者之间的一致性令人满意,但不如观察者内部的一致性。