Zandona Andrea G Ferreira, Al-Shiha Sattam, Eggertsson Hafsteinn, Eckert George
Indiana University School of Dentistry, Preventive and Community Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):598-604. doi: 10.2341/08-082-L.
The current study compared three groups of participants with different levels of clinical experience in using the International Caries and Detection System (ICDAS) on occlusal surfaces. Thirty participants (faculty, graduate and undergraduate students), after a lecture and hands-on training session on two occasions, examined 60 occlusal surfaces previously examined by two criteria expert examiners. There were no significant differences between the groups for intra- and inter-examiner agreement for ICDAS severity or activity on occlusal surfaces as measured by kappa. Previous clinical dental experience does not seem to play a significant role in learning ICDAS.
本研究比较了三组在使用国际龋病检测系统(ICDAS)检查咬合面方面临床经验水平不同的参与者。30名参与者(教员、研究生和本科生)在两次讲座和实践培训课程后,检查了60个先前由两名标准专家检查过的咬合面。通过kappa测量,在咬合面ICDAS严重程度或活动度的检查者内和检查者间一致性方面,各组之间没有显著差异。先前的临床牙科经验在学习ICDAS方面似乎没有起到显著作用。