Holtzman Jennifer S, Ballantine Jami, Fontana Margherita, Wang Alex, Calantog Alden, Benavides Erika, Gonzalez-Cabezas Carlos, Chen Zhongping, Wilder-Smith Petra
School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095.
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Aug;46(6):499-507. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22249. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
Clinicians have difficulty assessing and monitoring early occlusal caries. Traditional clinical exam and radiographs are unable to detect the subtle alterations in enamel indicative of de- or re-mineralization, particularly under dental sealants. Although clinicians have used laser fluorescence (LF) to address this gap, this modality has demonstrated weak correlation with histology. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for caries detection, but since it is based on visual assessment, it is of no use in areas beneath the most commonly used dental sealants which are opaque. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an emergent assessment tool which has demonstrated great promise in detecting and quantifying caries, including areas beneath commonly used dental sealants and composites. However, OCT has not yet been widely integrated into clinical dental practice, perhaps because OCT imaging does not provide an easily accessible diagnostic outcome for clinicians. The objective of this ex vivo study was to use OCT-images of sound and carious occlusal surfaces in combination with a simple algorithm to compare the caries detection ability of OCT with tools clinicians may be more familiar with (LF and radiography), and with an established valid and reliable clinical assessment tool (ICDAS-II).
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty extracted teeth with sound or naturally carious occlusal surfaces were imaged with OCT, LF, radiography, and examined clinically with the ICDAS-II. Teeth were randomized to one of two dental sealants recommended for use with LF. A novel simple algorithm was used to interpret OCT-based images. The accuracy of caries severity assessments of the OCT-based diagnosis, LF, ICDAS-II, and digital radiography were compared to the 4-point histological analysis gold standard.
OCT and ICDAS-II caries severity assessments demonstrated high sensitivity (94.0%; 92.3%) and specificity (85.0%; 83.3%), LF demonstrated low sensitivity (65.2%) but high specificity (97.6%), and digital radiography demonstrated low sensitivity (67.1%) with moderate specificity (79.5%) on unsealed occlusal surfaces. OCT-based caries severity assessments of sealed teeth demonstrated high specificity (97.6%), sensitivity (89.9%), excellent positive predictive value (98.6%), and negative predictive value (83.3%). Despite our use of LF recommended dental sealants, in the presence of sealants, LF assessment of caries severity demonstrated high sensitivity (95.1%), but extremely low specificity (10.3%), positive predictive value (68.8%), and negative predictive value (50.0%).
This study found that OCT-based imaging combined with a simple diagnostic algorithm accurately assessed the severity of natural early caries on occlusal surfaces in extracted teeth both in the absence and presence of dental sealant. The findings of this study support the clinical use of OCT imaging for assessment and monitoring progression of early non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal surfaces including areas under dental sealants.
临床医生在评估和监测早期咬合面龋方面存在困难。传统的临床检查和X线片无法检测出牙釉质中指示脱矿或再矿化的细微变化,尤其是在牙釉质封闭剂下方。尽管临床医生已使用激光荧光(LF)来弥补这一差距,但这种方法与组织学的相关性较弱。国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS-II)在龋病检测方面已显示出高敏感性和特异性,但由于它基于视觉评估,因此对于最常用的不透明牙釉质封闭剂下方的区域毫无用处。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)是一种新兴的评估工具,在检测和量化龋病方面已显示出巨大潜力,包括常用牙釉质封闭剂和复合材料下方的区域。然而,OCT尚未广泛应用于临床牙科实践,这可能是因为OCT成像没有为临床医生提供易于获取的诊断结果。本体外研究的目的是将健康和龋坏咬合面的OCT图像与一种简单算法相结合,以比较OCT与临床医生可能更熟悉的工具(LF和X线摄影)以及既定的有效且可靠的临床评估工具(ICDAS-II)的龋病检测能力。
研究设计/材料与方法:对120颗具有健康或自然龋坏咬合面的离体牙进行OCT、LF、X线摄影成像,并使用ICDAS-II进行临床检查。将牙齿随机分为两种推荐与LF配合使用的牙釉质封闭剂中的一种。使用一种新颖的简单算法来解读基于OCT的图像。将基于OCT的诊断、LF、ICDAS-II和数字X线摄影的龋病严重程度评估的准确性与4分组织学分析金标准进行比较。
OCT和ICDAS-II的龋病严重程度评估显示出高敏感性(94.0%;92.3%)和特异性(85.0%;83.3%),LF显示出低敏感性(65.2%)但高特异性(97.6%),数字X线摄影在未封闭的咬合面上显示出低敏感性(67.1%)和中等特异性(79.5%)。基于OCT的封闭牙龋病严重程度评估显示出高特异性(97.6%)、敏感性(89.9%)、出色的阳性预测值(98.6%)和阴性预测值(83.3%)。尽管我们使用了推荐与LF配合使用的牙釉质封闭剂,但在有封闭剂的情况下,LF对龋病严重程度的评估显示出高敏感性(95.1%),但特异性极低(10.3%)、阳性预测值(68.8%)和阴性预测值(50.0%)。
本研究发现,基于OCT的成像与一种简单的诊断算法相结合,能够准确评估离体牙咬合面自然早期龋的严重程度,无论是否存在牙釉质封闭剂。本研究结果支持将OCT成像用于评估和监测咬合面早期非龋洞性龋损的进展,包括牙釉质封闭剂下方的区域。