• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目光转移不会影响对图形模式的偏好判断。

Gaze shifts do not affect preference judgments of graphic patterns.

作者信息

Nittono Hiroshi, Wada Yuka

机构信息

Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):79-94. doi: 10.2466/PMS.109.1.79-94.

DOI:10.2466/PMS.109.1.79-94
PMID:19831089
Abstract

The gaze cascade hypothesis argues that orienting behavior reflected in gaze shift plays an important role in preference formation for an object. Gazing at an object serves as reinforcement, by which the likelihood of gazing at that object again is increased. Evidence for this hypothesis has been obtained mainly from experiments in which people compare two facial stimuli for attractiveness. Two experiments were conducted to examine whether the gaze cascade effect occurs in preference judgments of novel graphic patterns. In Exp. 1, eye movements were tracked during three types of comparison tasks i n which participantsdecided which one of two graphic patterns was more attractive, less attractive, or subjectively brighter. In Exp. 2, stimulus duration (900 or 300 msec.) and gaze shift (with or without) were manipulated. None of the results supported the hypothesis that gaze shifts would affect preference formation. Instead, the mere exposure effect was supported-stimuli that were viewed longer were preferred to those viewed for less time, regardless of gaze shift.

摘要

注视级联假说认为,注视转移所反映的定向行为在对物体的偏好形成中起着重要作用。注视一个物体起到了强化作用,通过这种方式增加了再次注视该物体的可能性。这一假说的证据主要来自于人们比较两种面部刺激物吸引力的实验。进行了两项实验来检验注视级联效应是否出现在对新颖图形模式的偏好判断中。在实验1中,在三种类型的比较任务中跟踪眼动,参与者要判断两个图形模式中哪一个更具吸引力、吸引力更小或主观上更亮。在实验2中,对刺激持续时间(900或300毫秒)和注视转移(有或没有)进行了操控。没有任何结果支持注视转移会影响偏好形成这一假说。相反,得到支持的是单纯曝光效应——无论有无注视转移,观看时间较长的刺激物比观看时间较短的刺激物更受青睐。

相似文献

1
Gaze shifts do not affect preference judgments of graphic patterns.目光转移不会影响对图形模式的偏好判断。
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):79-94. doi: 10.2466/PMS.109.1.79-94.
2
Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.眼睛总是吸引注意力,但注视定向取决于任务:来自眼动监测的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
3
Properties of human eye-head gaze shifts in an anti-gaze shift task.人类在反注视转移任务中眼头注视转移的特性。
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):538-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.014. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
4
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.注视偏差既反映偏好,又影响偏好。
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22. doi: 10.1038/nn1150. Epub 2003 Nov 9.
5
3-Dimensional eye-head coordination in gaze shifts evoked during stimulation of the lateral intraparietal cortex.三维眼头协调在刺激外侧顶内沟时引发的眼球扫视中。
Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 15;164(3):1284-302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.066. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
6
The relation between gaze behavior and categorization: does where we look determine what we see?注视行为与分类之间的关系:我们所看之处是否决定了我们所看到的东西?
J Vis. 2013 May 14;13(6):6. doi: 10.1167/13.6.6.
7
Motor ontology in representing gaze-object relations.运动本体在表征注视-物体关系中的作用。
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jan 17;430(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
8
Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.图像注视线索并不能提高长尾猕猴在计算机化物体定位任务中的表现。
Behav Processes. 2006 Nov 1;73(3):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
9
Temporal stimulus properties that attract gaze to the periphery and repel gaze from fixation.将目光吸引到外周并使目光从注视点移开的时间刺激特性。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 8;13(5):6. doi: 10.1167/13.5.6.
10
Number magnitude determines gaze direction: Spatial-numerical association in a free-choice task.数字大小决定注视方向:自由选择任务中的空间-数字关联。
Cortex. 2011 May;47(5):617-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitating animacy perception by manipulating stimuli exposure time.通过操纵刺激暴露时间促进生命感知。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1017685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017685. eCollection 2022.
2
Urgency Promotes Affective Disengagement: Effects From Bivalent Cues on Preference Formation for Abstract Images.紧迫感促进情感脱离:二价线索对抽象图像偏好形成的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 23;11:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01404. eCollection 2020.
3
The gaze bias effect in toddlers: Preliminary evidence for the developmental study of visual decision-making.
婴儿注视偏向效应:视觉决策发展研究的初步证据。
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12969. doi: 10.1111/desc.12969. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
Evaluative Processing of Food Images: A Conditional Role for Viewing in Preference Formation.食物图像的评价性加工:观看在偏好形成中的条件性作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 11;9:936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00936. eCollection 2018.
5
A gaze bias with coarse spatial indexing during a gambling task.赌博任务期间存在伴有粗略空间索引的注视偏向。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2018 Apr;12(2):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s11571-017-9463-z. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
Gaze Bias in Preference Judgments by Younger and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人在偏好判断中的注视偏差。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Aug 25;9:285. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00285. eCollection 2017.
7
The effect of gaze-contingent stimulus elimination on preference judgments.注视相关刺激消除对偏好判断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 9;6:1351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01351. eCollection 2015.
8
The tell-tale look: viewing time, preferences, and prices.明显的特征:观看时间、偏好和价格。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 12;10(1):e0117137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117137. eCollection 2015.