Touwaide Alain
Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
Med Secoli. 2008;20(2):591-605.
The Treatise on Venoms and Poisons (Liber de venenis) by Pietro d'Abano has been traditionally considered as a collection of superstitions and unscientific data, even though it was also--and paradoxically--deemed interesting for the history of medieval science. The present contribution frames the treatise in the ancient toxicological literature, and suggests textual similarities with classical Greek works, mainly the two treatises On Venoms and On Poisons ascribed to the first-century A.D. author of De materia medica Dioscorides. Since Pietro d'Abano sojourned in Constantinople he might have had access to the Greek texts of these two works and could very well have integrated some of their information in his own treatise.
彼得罗·达巴诺所著的《毒液与毒物论》(《Liber de venenis》)传统上被视为迷信与非科学数据的集合,尽管矛盾的是,它在中世纪科学史上也被认为饶有趣味。本文将该论著置于古代毒理学文献的框架中,并指出其与古希腊著作在文本上的相似之处,主要是公元一世纪《药物论》作者狄奥斯科里季斯所著的两篇论著《论毒液》和《论毒物》。由于彼得罗·达巴诺曾旅居君士坦丁堡,他或许能够获取这两部著作的希腊文本,并且很可能已将其中的一些信息融入到他自己的论著中。