Cohen D R
Department of Management Studies, Polytechnic of Wales, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan, UK.
Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(3-4):313-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.3-4.313.
The objective of this study is to explore the problems which can arise when quality issues are introduced without proper analysis of the nature and objectives of health care. The principles of economics are used to explain why the primary output of health care should be perceived in terms of health gained (or maintained). Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) is concerned with achieving a given output at lowest cost. The problems of measuring and valuing health gains, as well as problems arising when a quality dimension is introduced, are discussed with reference to the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) as a measure of health gain. Quality of service provision is normally achieved at an increased cost per QALY. This need not make high quality services inefficient provided care is taken in use of terms and Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used to highlight the value placed on consumer satisfaction.
本研究的目的是探讨在未对医疗保健的性质和目标进行适当分析的情况下引入质量问题时可能出现的问题。运用经济学原理来解释为何医疗保健的主要产出应从获得(或维持)的健康角度来理解。成本效益分析(CEA)关注的是以最低成本实现既定产出。参照作为健康收益衡量指标的质量调整生命年(QALY),讨论了衡量和评估健康收益的问题,以及引入质量维度时出现的问题。通常,每增加一个质量调整生命年,服务提供质量的提升都伴随着成本的增加。只要在术语使用上谨慎,并运用成本效益分析(CBA)来突出消费者满意度的价值,就不必使高质量服务变得低效。