Yang Xueyan, Li Shuzhuo, Wu Zheng, Schimmele Christoph M
Institute for Population and Development Studies, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, PR China.
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2009;55(1):82-92. doi: 10.1080/19485560903054721.
This article introduces two scales for measuring the gender-specific burden of family planning (FP) and reproductive health (RH) in rural China, following the implementation of a client-oriented approach to FP/RH. One scale (GHRHS-SC) measures FP/RH clients to examine whether gender influences FP/RH behaviors. The other scale (GHRHS-SP) measures service provider interactions with service clients to gauge whether FP/RH institutions are fulfilling the client-oriented mandate. The content of scales was developed through inductive analysis conducted on data generated from focus groups and in-depth interviews. The validation of the scales was confirmed with item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. To generate data for validation purposes, we employed a stratified cluster sampling method for a sample of service providers and a stratified multistage method for a sample of service clients. The analytical results indicate that the scales possess good internal consistency, reliability, and overall validity. The construct validity for the GHRHS-SP needs some improvement. Both the GHRHS-SC and GHRHS-SP are valid instruments for measuring gender differences in FP/RH behavior, though further refinements would be beneficial.
本文介绍了在中国农村实施以服务对象为导向的计划生育(FP)和生殖健康(RH)方法后,用于衡量计划生育和生殖健康方面性别特定负担的两个量表。一个量表(GHRHS-SC)用于衡量计划生育/生殖健康服务对象,以检验性别是否会影响计划生育/生殖健康行为。另一个量表(GHRHS-SP)用于衡量服务提供者与服务对象之间的互动,以评估计划生育/生殖健康机构是否履行了以服务对象为导向的职责。量表的内容是通过对焦点小组和深入访谈产生的数据进行归纳分析而制定的。量表的有效性通过项目分析、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析得到证实。为了生成用于验证目的的数据,我们对服务提供者样本采用了分层整群抽样方法,对服务对象样本采用了分层多阶段抽样方法。分析结果表明,这些量表具有良好的内部一致性、可靠性和整体有效性。GHRHS-SP的结构效度需要一些改进。GHRHS-SC和GHRHS-SP都是衡量计划生育/生殖健康行为中性别差异的有效工具,不过进一步完善会更有益处。