Suppr超能文献

放射科住院医师是否应该学习循证放射学?“EBR 杂志俱乐部”的一项实验。

Should radiology residents be taught evidence-based radiology? An experiment with "the EBR Journal Club".

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East #1A071, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2140, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2009 Dec;16(12):1549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.013.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Introduce radiology residents to evidence-based radiology (EBR) using a journal club format based on the Radiology Alliance for Health Services Research/American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (RAHSR/A3CR2) Critical Thinking Skills sessions and EBR series of articles published in Radiology in 2007.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The club began with a presentation outlining the process that would occur in an alternating format, with topics and articles chosen by residents. In session A, questions were rephrased in a Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format, and a literature search was performed. Articles were discussed in session B, with residents assigned by year to the tasks of article summary, technology assessment, and comparison to checklists (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, or Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis). The residents collectively assigned a level of evidence to each article, and a scribe provided a summary.

RESULTS

Twenty-two residents participated, with 12/22 (55%) of residents submitting any question, 6/22 (27.3%) submitting more than one question, and 4 residents submitting questions in more than one session. Topics included radiation risk, emergency radiology, screening examinations, modality comparisons, and technology assessment. Of the 31 articles submitted for review, 15 were in radiology journals and 5 were published before 2000. For 2/9 topics searched, no single article that the residents selected was available through our library's subscription service. The maximum level of evidence assigned by residents was level III, "limited evidence." In each session, the residents concluded that they became less confident in the "right answer." They proposed that future reading recommendations come from attendings rather than literature searches.

CONCLUSION

A journal club format is an effective tool to teach radiology residents EBR principles. Resistance comes from the difficulty in accessing good literature for review and in constructing good review questions.

摘要

引入放射科住院医师循证放射学(EBR),使用基于放射科健康服务研究联盟/放射学学术首席住院医师联盟(RAHSR/A3CR2)批判性思维技能课程和 2007 年放射学发表的 EBR 系列文章的期刊俱乐部格式。

材料和方法

俱乐部开始时,先进行一次演讲,概述将以交替格式进行的过程,主题和文章由住院医师选择。在 A 会上,问题以患者/人群、干预、比较、结果的形式重新表述,并进行文献检索。在 B 会上讨论文章,按年份分配住院医师完成文章摘要、技术评估和与清单的比较(诊断准确性报告标准、临床试验报告标准或荟萃分析报告质量)的任务。住院医师共同为每篇文章分配证据水平,并由记录员提供摘要。

结果

22 名住院医师参加了会议,其中 12/22(55%)的住院医师提交了任何问题,6/22(27.3%)提交了一个以上的问题,4 名住院医师在多个会议中提交了问题。主题包括辐射风险、紧急放射学、筛查检查、模态比较和技术评估。提交审查的 31 篇文章中,有 15 篇来自放射学期刊,有 5 篇发表于 2000 年之前。在 9 个主题中,有 2 个主题搜索没有一篇住院医师选择的文章可通过我们图书馆的订阅服务获得。住院医师分配的最高证据水平为 III 级,“有限证据”。在每次会议上,住院医师都认为他们对“正确答案”的信心降低了。他们提出,未来的阅读建议应该来自主治医生,而不是文献检索。

结论

期刊俱乐部格式是教授放射科住院医师 EBR 原则的有效工具。阻力来自于难以获取高质量文献进行审查和构建高质量审查问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验