Smaldone Marc C, Corcoran Anthony T, Hayn Matthew, Konety Badrinath R, Hrebinko Ronald L, Davies Benjamin J
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, USA.
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.024.
The POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) and Portsmouth POSSUM predictor equations are scoring systems validated in the general surgery literature that estimate postoperative morbidity and mortality risk. We tested the validity of POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with continent diversion.
We retrospectively reviewed physiological parameters, operative parameters, and 30-day morbidity and mortality in 102 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with continent orthotopic diversion, as done by a single surgeon. Predicted morbidity and mortality were calculated using the POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM equations. Patients were stratified into risk groups, and observed and predicted outcomes were compared. The accuracy of predictions was assessed using binomial and chi-square analysis.
Observed mortality and morbidity rates were 2.9% and 34.3%, respectively. Predicted morbidity using POSSUM analysis was 46 compared to the 35 observed in our series (p = 0.01). Compared to 3 observed deaths predicted mortality using POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM analysis was 13 and 5 (p = 0.002 and 0.30, respectively). There was a significant lack of fit for the POSSUM model to predict morbidity and mortality (p <0.05). However, the mortality risk estimated by Portsmouth POSSUM was not significantly different from the observed mortality rate in our cohort.
In our series the POSSUM equation over predicted morbidity and mortality, and was unsuitable for a comparative audit of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with continent diversion. The Portsmouth POSSUM equation allowed satisfactory prediction of mortality in our cohort and should be evaluated further in larger series.
POSSUM(用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理与手术严重程度评分)和朴茨茅斯POSSUM预测方程是在普通外科文献中得到验证的评分系统,可估计术后发病和死亡风险。我们测试了POSSUM和朴茨茅斯POSSUM在接受根治性膀胱切除术并行可控性尿流改道患者中的有效性。
我们回顾性分析了由一位外科医生实施的102例行根治性膀胱切除术并行原位可控性尿流改道患者的生理参数、手术参数以及30天的发病率和死亡率。使用POSSUM和朴茨茅斯POSSUM方程计算预测的发病率和死亡率。将患者分层为风险组,比较观察到的和预测的结果。使用二项式和卡方分析评估预测的准确性。
观察到的死亡率和发病率分别为2.9%和34.3%。使用POSSUM分析预测的发病率为46,而我们系列中观察到的为35(p = 0.01)。与观察到的3例死亡相比,使用POSSUM和朴茨茅斯POSSUM分析预测的死亡率分别为13和5(p分别为0.002和0.30)。POSSUM模型在预测发病率和死亡率方面存在显著的拟合不足(p <0.05)。然而,朴茨茅斯POSSUM估计的死亡风险与我们队列中观察到的死亡率无显著差异。
在我们的系列研究中,POSSUM方程高估了发病率和死亡率,不适用于对接受根治性膀胱切除术并行可控性尿流改道患者进行比较性审计。朴茨茅斯POSSUM方程能够令人满意地预测我们队列中的死亡率,应在更大系列中进一步评估。