Suppr超能文献

脾切除术及抗病毒治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的血小板减少症患者

Splenectomy and antiviral treatment for thrombocytopenic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

作者信息

Ikezawa K, Naito M, Yumiba T, Iwahashi K, Onishi Y, Kita H, Nishio A, Kanno T, Matsuura T, Ono A, Chiba M, Mizuno T, Aketa H, Maeda K, Michida T, Katayama K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Koseinenkin Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2010 Jul;17(7):488-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01211.x. Epub 2009 Oct 13.

Abstract

Thrombocytopenic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are poor candidates for antiviral treatment with interferon (IFN), but no standard treatment for thrombocytopenia has yet been established. We evaluated the safety of splenectomy and its efficacy for the initiation and continuation of antiviral therapy. From March 2003 to April 2006, 10 patients (mean age 62.5 years) with HCV-related cirrhosis, low platelet count (<==106 000/mm(3)) and splenomegaly (spleen size >==10 cm) underwent splenectomy. Platelet counts significantly increased at 4-8 weeks after splenectomy [pre: 64 200 +/- 6900/mm(3)vs post 209 000 +/- 40 600/mm(3) (P = 0.004)]. No severe operative complications were observed. All patients subsequently received antiviral therapy. Of the eight patients who were infected with HCV genotype 1 and had a high viral load (>==100 KIU/mL), four received combination therapy with pegylated IFNalpha-2b plus ribavirin, and the other four received standard IFNalpha-2b plus ribavirin. One patient infected with HCV genotype 2 and another with HCV genotype 1 and a low viral load (<100 KIU/mL) were treated with pegylated IFNalpha-2a. Six patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). Among four patients who failed to achieve SVR, one was given retreatment with pegylated IFN plus ribavirin, and the other three received low-dose long-term IFN therapy. Although this study was small, the treatment results were similar to those for patients without thrombocytopenia and suggested that splenectomy would not reduce the antiviral efficacy of IFNalpha-based treatment.

摘要

慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的血小板减少患者不是干扰素(IFN)抗病毒治疗的理想人选,但血小板减少症的标准治疗方法尚未确立。我们评估了脾切除术的安全性及其在启动和持续抗病毒治疗方面的疗效。2003年3月至2006年4月,10例(平均年龄62.5岁)患有HCV相关肝硬化、低血小板计数(<==106 000/mm³)和脾肿大(脾脏大小>==10 cm)的患者接受了脾切除术。脾切除术后4 - 8周血小板计数显著增加[术前:64 200 ± 6900/mm³对术后209 000 ± 40 600/mm³(P = 0.004)]。未观察到严重的手术并发症。所有患者随后均接受了抗病毒治疗。在8例感染HCV 1型且病毒载量高(>==100 KIU/mL)的患者中,4例接受了聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b加利巴韦林的联合治疗,另外4例接受了标准干扰素α-2b加利巴韦林的治疗。1例感染HCV 2型的患者和另1例感染HCV 1型且病毒载量低(<100 KIU/mL)的患者接受了聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗。6例患者实现了持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在4例未实现SVR的患者中,1例接受了聚乙二醇化干扰素加利巴韦林的再治疗,另外三例接受了低剂量长期干扰素治疗。尽管这项研究规模较小,但治疗结果与无血小板减少症患者的结果相似,提示脾切除术不会降低基于干扰素α治疗的抗病毒疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验