Durnian Jonathan Mark, Owen Manon Elena, Marsh Ian Bruce
Department of Ophthalmology, Walton Hospital, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J AAPOS. 2009 Oct;13(5):477-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.06.006.
To compare two quality-of-life (QoL) scales and subscales: the Derriford Appearance Scale 59 (DAS59) and the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) scale in a series of strabismic and nonstrabismic patients and to illustrate the differences in results between strabismic and nonstrabismic patients.
The DAS59 is a self-report QoL questionnaire generating an assessment of distress caused by problems of appearance. The AS-20 is a newly developed strabismus specific QoL scale. A prospective, noninterventional study of a series of consecutive adult patients undergoing strabismus surgery and a control group was performed. Patients were given both questionnaires to complete before surgery. The underlying condition, previous number of surgeries, and deviation measurements were recorded.
Thirty-four patients and 30 controls correctly completed both questionnaires. In the strabismus group, the mean AS-20 score was 50.5. The mean DAS59 score was 122.5 (out of 269). There is strong correlation between the scales (r = -0.813; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.66; p < 0.0001). In the control group, the AS-20 score was 98.8 and the DAS59, 84.4, with both showing significant differences to the strabismic group (t = 12.9 [p < 0.0001] and t = -4.642 [p < 0.0001], respectively).
The AS-20 shows strong correlation to the widely used DAS59. Strabismus patients show significantly more psychosocial distress than controls. The AS-20 is specific to strabismus patients and the result is not influenced by any other systemic factors that can impinge on the more general DAS59 scale.
比较两种生活质量(QoL)量表及其子量表:德里福德外貌量表59(DAS59)和成人斜视-20(AS-20)量表,研究对象为一系列斜视和非斜视患者,并阐述斜视患者与非斜视患者在结果上的差异。
DAS59是一份自我报告的生活质量问卷,用于评估外貌问题所导致的苦恼程度。AS-20是新开发的斜视特异性生活质量量表。对一系列连续接受斜视手术的成年患者及一个对照组进行了一项前瞻性、非干预性研究。患者在手术前需完成这两份问卷。记录患者的基础病情、既往手术次数及斜视度数测量结果。
34例患者和30名对照者正确完成了两份问卷。在斜视组中,AS-20量表的平均得分为50.5分。DAS59量表的平均得分为122.5分(满分269分)。两个量表之间存在强相关性(r = -0.813;95%置信区间,-0.90至-0.66;p < 0.0001)。在对照组中,AS-20量表得分为98.8分,DAS59量表得分为84.4分,两者与斜视组相比均有显著差异(分别为t = 12.9 [p < 0.000 1]和t = -4.642 [p < 0.000 1]))。
AS-20量表与广泛使用的DAS59量表显示出强相关性。斜视患者的心理社会苦恼明显多于对照组。AS-20量表是斜视患者所特有的,其结果不受任何其他可能影响更通用的DAS59量表的全身性因素的影响。