Royal Brompton Hospital and National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2010 Apr;35(4):830-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00155108. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
In therapeutic studies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the low prevalence of significant change in pulmonary functional tests (PFTs) has been a major constraint. The prognostic value of "marginal" changes in PFTs in IPF and fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) was evaluated. In patients with biopsy-proven IPF (n = 84) and NSIP (n = 72), forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D( L,CO)) trends at 6 months were categorised as "significant" (FVC >10%; D(L,CO) >15%) or "marginal" (FVC 5-10%; D(L,CO) 7.5-15%). Proportional hazards analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic methodology were used to examine PFT trends against mortality. In IPF, reductions in FVC were significant in 22 cases (26%) and marginal in 19 cases (23%). Mortality was higher in patients with a significant decline in FVC (hazard ratio (HR) 2.80, 95% CI 1.54-5.06; p<0.001) and those with a marginal decline in FVC (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.19-4.50; p = 0.01) than in those with stable disease. Progression-free survival was lower when the decline in FVC was marginal than in stable disease (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.19-4.60; p = 0.01). Marginal changes in D(L,CO) in IPF and marginal changes in FVC and D (L,CO) in fibrotic NSIP did not provide useful prognostic information. Marginal change in FVC in IPF denotes a poor outcome. These findings are applicable to clinical practice and to the selection of patients with more progressive disease for therapeutic studies.
在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的治疗研究中,肺功能测试(PFT)中显著变化的低发生率一直是一个主要限制。评估了 IPF 和纤维化非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)中 PFT“边缘”变化的预后价值。在经活检证实的 IPF 患者(n = 84)和 NSIP 患者(n = 72)中,6 个月时用力肺活量(FVC)和一氧化碳弥散量(D(L,CO))趋势被分类为“显著”(FVC >10%;D(L,CO)>15%)或“边缘”(FVC 5-10%;D(L,CO)7.5-15%)。比例风险分析和时间依赖的接收器操作特性方法用于检查 PFT 趋势与死亡率之间的关系。在 IPF 中,FVC 下降在 22 例(26%)中为显著,在 19 例(23%)中为边缘。FVC 显著下降的患者死亡率更高(风险比(HR)2.80,95%置信区间 1.54-5.06;p<0.001)和 FVC 边缘下降的患者(HR 2.31,95%置信区间 1.19-4.50;p = 0.01)高于稳定疾病的患者。FVC 下降边缘时无进展生存率低于稳定疾病(HR 2.34,95%置信区间 1.19-4.60;p = 0.01)。IPF 中 D(L,CO)的边缘变化和纤维化 NSIP 中 FVC 和 D(L,CO)的边缘变化并不能提供有用的预后信息。IPF 中 FVC 的边缘变化表示预后不良。这些发现适用于临床实践和为治疗研究选择更具进展性疾病的患者。