Gender Identity Service, Child, Youth, and Family Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):477-98. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9540-4.
In this article, I review the diagnostic criteria for Gender Identity Disorder (GID) in children as they were formulated in the DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV. The article focuses on the cumulative evidence for diagnostic reliability and validity. It does not address the broader conceptual discussion regarding GID as "disorder," as this issue is addressed in a companion article by Meyer-Bahlburg (2009). This article addresses criticisms of the GID criteria for children which, in my view, can be addressed by extant empirical data. Based in part on reanalysis of data, I conclude that the persistent desire to be of the other gender should, in contrast to DSM-IV, be a necessary symptom for the diagnosis. If anything, this would result in a tightening of the diagnostic criteria and may result in a better separation of children with GID from children who display marked gender variance, but without the desire to be of the other gender.
在本文中,我回顾了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)第三版、第三版修订版和第四版中儿童性别认同障碍(GID)的诊断标准。本文重点介绍了诊断可靠性和有效性的累积证据。它没有涉及关于 GID 作为“障碍”的更广泛的概念讨论,因为迈耶-巴尔伯格(Meyer-Bahlburg)的一篇相关文章(2009)对此进行了讨论。本文针对针对儿童 GID 标准的批评进行了探讨,在我看来,这些批评可以通过现有的经验数据来解决。部分基于对数据的重新分析,我得出结论,与 DSM-IV 相反,持续渴望成为另一种性别应该成为诊断的必要症状。如果有的话,这将导致诊断标准的收紧,并可能导致 GID 儿童与表现出明显性别差异但没有成为另一种性别的愿望的儿童更好地分开。