New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):461-76. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9532-4.
The categorization of gender identity variants (GIVs) as "mental disorders" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association is highly controversial among professionals as well as among persons with GIV. After providing a brief history of GIV categorizations in the DSM, this paper presents some of the major issues of the ongoing debate: GIV as psychopathology versus natural variation; definition of "impairment" and "distress" for GID; associated psychopathology and its relation to stigma; the stigma impact of the mental-disorder label itself; the unusual character of "sex reassignment surgery" as a psychiatric treatment; and the consequences for health and mental-health services if the disorder label is removed. Finally, several categorization options are examined: Retaining the GID category, but possibly modifying its grouping with other syndromes; narrowing the definition to dysphoria and taking "disorder" out of the label; categorizing GID as a neurological or medical rather than a psychiatric disorder; removing GID from both the DSM and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD); and creating a special category for GIV in the DSM. I conclude that-as also evident in other DSM categories-the decision on the categorization of GIVs cannot be achieved on a purely scientific basis, and that a consensus for a pragmatic compromise needs to be arrived at that accommodates both scientific considerations and the service needs of persons with GIVs.
将性别认同变体(GIV)归类为美国精神病学协会《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中的“精神障碍”,在专业人士以及 GIV 患者中都存在很大争议。本文简要回顾了 DSM 中 GIV 的分类历史,介绍了当前争论的一些主要问题:GIV 是精神病理学还是自然变异;GID 的“损伤”和“痛苦”定义;相关精神病理学及其与污名的关系;精神障碍标签本身的污名影响;“性别重置手术”作为一种精神科治疗的不寻常特征;以及如果去除障碍标签,对健康和精神健康服务的影响。最后,还探讨了几种分类选择:保留 GID 类别,但可能会修改其与其他综合征的分组方式;将定义缩小为不适,并从标签中删除“障碍”;将 GID 归类为神经或医学疾病,而不是精神疾病;将 GID 从 DSM 和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)中删除;并在 DSM 中为 GIV 创建一个特殊类别。我得出的结论是——正如在其他 DSM 类别中一样——不能仅基于科学依据来决定 GIV 的分类,需要达成一个务实的妥协共识,既要考虑到科学因素,也要考虑到 GIV 患者的服务需求。