Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Vet Rec. 2009 Oct 17;165(16):461-5. doi: 10.1136/vr.165.16.461.
Several systems are being used in England to record information about the health of pigs. The British Pig Health Scheme (BPHS), the National Animal Disease Information System (NADIS), the Zoonoses Action Plan (ZAP) for Salmonella and the Veterinary Investigation Diagnosis Analysis (VIDA) system have been assessed to make recommendations for their future separate or joint development. The structure, organisation, processes, data quality, dissemination, utilisation and acceptance of each system have been assessed. Information was extracted from documents and websites, and informal interviews were conducted with technical experts and stakeholders. The systems covered a broad range of objectives, used variable approaches and operated at very different scales and budgets. There was a high level of awareness and involvement by the industry. Common weaknesses of the systems were the lack of in-depth quantitative analysis of the data, the lack of assessment of each system's impact, and the unknown level of bias as a result of the voluntary or selective participation in them.
英国正在使用多个系统来记录有关猪只健康状况的信息。英国猪健康计划（BPHS）、国家动物疾病信息系统（NADIS）、沙门氏菌的动物传染病行动计划（ZAP）和兽医调查诊断分析（VIDA）系统已进行了评估，以便为其未来的单独或联合发展提出建议。每个系统的结构、组织、流程、数据质量、传播、利用和接受情况都进行了评估。从文件和网站中提取了信息，并与技术专家和利益相关者进行了非正式访谈。这些系统涵盖了广泛的目标，采用了不同的方法，并且在规模和预算上差异很大。行业的参与度很高。这些系统的共同弱点是缺乏对数据的深入定量分析，缺乏对每个系统影响的评估，以及由于自愿或选择性参与而导致的未知程度的偏差。
