• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善危重病患者的临床试验。

Improving clinical trials in the critically ill.

机构信息

CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):527-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0259d.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0259d
PMID:19851096
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To propose ways in which clinical trials in intensive care can be improved.

METHODS

An international roundtable conference was convened focused on improvement in three broad areas: translation of new knowledge from bench to bedside; design and conduct of clinical trials; and clinical trial infrastructure and environment.

RESULTS

The roundtable recommendations were: improvement in clinical trials is a multistep process from better preclinical studies to better clinical trial methodology; new technologies should be used to improve models of critical illness; diseasomes and theragnostics will aid inpatient population selection and more appropriate targeting of interventions; broader study end points should include morbidity as well as mortality; more multicenter studies should be conducted by national and international networks or clinical trials groups; and better collaboration is needed with the industry.

CONCLUSIONS

There was broad agreement among the roundtable participants regarding a number of explicit opportunities for the improvement of clinical trials in critical care.

摘要

目的

提出改进重症监护临床试验的方法。

方法

召开了一次国际圆桌会议,重点讨论了三个广泛领域的改进措施:将基础研究的新知识转化为床边治疗;临床试验的设计和实施;临床试验的基础设施和环境。

结果

圆桌会议的建议包括:临床试验的改进是一个多步骤的过程,从更好的临床前研究到更好的临床试验方法;应利用新技术改进危重病模型;疾病组和治疗学将有助于选择住院患者人群,并更恰当地针对干预措施;更广泛的研究终点应包括发病率和死亡率;更多的多中心研究应由国家和国际网络或临床试验组进行;需要与行业更好地合作。

结论

圆桌会议参与者就重症监护临床试验的一些明确改进机会达成了广泛共识。

相似文献

1
Improving clinical trials in the critically ill.改善危重病患者的临床试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):527-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0259d.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Bayesian methodology for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in critical care medicine: a primer for clinicians.用于重症医学临床试验设计与解读的贝叶斯方法:临床医生入门指南
Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2267-77. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000576.
4
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
7
A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: time for improvement.对危重症患者营养支持试验真实方法学质量的综述:改进时机已至。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):527-533. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000141676.12552.D0.
8
Conducting non-commercial international clinical trials: the ICR-CTSU experience.开展非商业性国际临床试验:ICR-CTSU的经验
Trials. 2017 Sep 26;18(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2176-0.
9
Worldwide Opinion on Multicenter Randomized Interventions Showing Mortality Reduction in Critically Ill Patients: A Democracy-Based Medicine Approach.关于多中心随机干预措施降低重症患者死亡率的全球观点:基于民主的医学方法
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1386-95. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) in Critically Ill Patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017.危重症患者危重症相关皮质类固醇功能不全(CIRCI)诊断与管理指南(第一部分):危重症医学会(SCCM)和欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM),2017年
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2078-2088. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002737.

引用本文的文献

1
The times are changing: A primer on novel clinical trial designs and endpoints in critical care research.时代在变:重症监护研究中新型临床试验设计与终点的入门指南。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Sep 9;81(18):890-902. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae134.
2
Long-Term Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Patient Evaluation.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的长期预后:流行病学、机制及患者评估
Crit Care Clin. 2021 Oct;37(4):895-911. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Postdischarge Outcome Domains in Pediatric Critical Care and the Instruments Used to Evaluate Them: A Scoping Review.
儿科重症监护后出院结局领域及其评估工具:范围综述。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):e1313-e1321. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004595.
4
Identification of a Novel Antisepsis Pathway: Sectm1a Enhances Macrophage Phagocytosis of Bacteria through Activating GITR.鉴定一种新型的抗菌途径:Sectm1a 通过激活 GITR 增强巨噬细胞对细菌的吞噬作用。
J Immunol. 2020 Sep 15;205(6):1633-1643. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000440. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.左西孟旦的疗效与安全性:临床应用Simdax的20年
Card Fail Rev. 2020 Jul 8;6:e19. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2020.03. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 Years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.左西孟旦疗效和安全性:SIMDAX 临床应用 20 年。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;76(1):4-22. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000859.
7
Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors' Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Outcomes: Quantitative Measures versus Semistructured Interviews.急性呼吸衰竭幸存者的身体、认知和心理健康结果:定量测量与半结构化访谈。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):731-737. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-851OC.
8
Pediatric ECMO Research: The Case for Collaboration.儿科体外膜肺氧合研究:合作的理由。
Front Pediatr. 2018 Sep 10;6:240. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00240. eCollection 2018.
9
Sample size implications of mortality definitions in sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.脓毒症中死亡率定义对样本量的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2570-2.
10
Patients' Outcomes After Acute Respiratory Failure: A Qualitative Study With the PROMIS Framework.急性呼吸衰竭后患者的预后:一项采用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)框架的定性研究
Am J Crit Care. 2017 Nov;26(6):456-465. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017834.