Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospitals, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):797-801. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c311f8.
To determine whether nasal bridling is a low-morbidity practice that decreases feeding tube dislodgment and results in improved caloric intake.
Randomized, controlled trial.
Private, tertiary-care referral center.
A total of 80 surgical intensive care unit patients requiring nasojejunal feeding.
Nasal bridling of feeding tubes.
Between January 1, 2008 and July 31, 2008, 80 patients were randomized to have their nasojejunal feeding tubes secured with either a nasal bridle or an adhesive device. Baseline characteristics examined included age, sex, concurrent nasogastric tube presence, primary diagnosis, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, need for mechanical ventilation, need for emergent surgery, Riker Sedation Score, and Glascow Coma Scale. Patients were monitored daily for prevalence and cause of feeding tube removal, percentage of goal calories received, nasal ulceration, and sinusitis. Serum albumin and prealbumin levels were collected weekly. All patients were examined, using an intention-to-treat design. Except for a higher prevalence of emergent surgery in the bridled patients, the bridled and unbridled groups had no difference in baseline characteristics. Bridled tubes were less likely to be unintentionally dislodged than unbridled tubes (18% vs. 63%, p < .0001) resulting in bridled patients receiving a higher percentage of goal calories (median 78% [interquartile range, 65%-86%] vs. 62% [interquartile range, 47%-80%], p = .016) than unbridled patients. There were five cases of mild epistaxis upon bridle insertion and four cases of superficial nasal ulceration associated with the bridle. No bridled patients were diagnosed with sinusitis during the study period. Serum albumin and prealbumin levels did not differ between the groups.
Bridling of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients is a low-morbidity practice that reduces the rate of unintentional tube dislodgment and may result in improved caloric intake.
确定鼻环扎是否是一种低并发症的操作,可减少饲管脱出,提高热量摄入。
随机对照试验。
私立三级转诊中心。
共 80 例需鼻空肠饲管喂养的外科重症监护病房患者。
鼻空肠饲管的鼻环扎。
2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 7 月 31 日,80 例患者随机分为两组,分别使用鼻环或黏贴装置固定鼻空肠饲管。检查的基线特征包括年龄、性别、同期存在的鼻胃管、主要诊断、急性生理学和慢性健康评估评分Ⅲ、需要机械通气、需要紧急手术、Riker 镇静评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分。每天监测患者饲管移除的发生率和原因、目标热量摄入百分比、鼻溃疡和鼻窦炎。每周采集血清白蛋白和前白蛋白水平。所有患者均采用意向治疗设计进行检查。除环扎组有更高的急诊手术发生率外,两组患者的基线特征无差异。与未环扎组相比,环扎组饲管更不易意外脱出(18%比 63%,p<0.0001),从而使环扎组患者摄入的目标热量百分比更高(中位数 78%[四分位距 65%-86%]比 62%[四分位距 47%-80%],p=0.016)。环扎置入时有 5 例轻度鼻出血,4 例与环扎相关的浅表鼻溃疡。研究期间,无环扎患者被诊断为鼻窦炎。两组患者的血清白蛋白和前白蛋白水平无差异。
对危重症患者的鼻肠饲管进行环扎是一种低并发症的操作,可降低非计划性管脱出的发生率,并可能提高热量摄入。