Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Comandante Garcia d'Avila 412, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Sep;93(3):283-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009000900013.
Prosthetic valve leak is a possible complication of surgical valve replacement. Although uncommon, its consequences may be serious. Few studies correlate the degree of prosthetic valve leak with clinical events.
To compare the postoperative outcome of patients with mild/moderate (Mi/Mo) or severe (Sev) prosthetic valve leak
A total of 185 patients with prosthetic valve leak were selected among 1350 patients undergoing heart valve surgery between 1999 and 2001. Of these, a sample of 58 patients (37 men) with prosthetic valve leak (36 with Mi/Mo versus 22 with Sev leak) in the pre and/or postoperative period of heart valve replacement had complete medical record data, so their clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data could be retrospectively assessed.
The incidence of reoperation was 11.1% in the Mi/Mo group, versus 22.7% in the Sev group (odds ratio = 2.35 [95% CI 0.56-9.94]). Endocarditis was the cause of reoperation in 75% of the patients of the Mi/Mo group and in 60% of the Sev group. Aortic bioprostheses were those most frequently related to leak (55.8% in the Mi/Mo group and 57.7% in the Sev group). Forty percent of the patients with previous Mi/Mo leak did not present prosthetic valve leak on postoperative day 2 versus 21.4% of the patients with Sev prosthetic valve leak. No significant differences were found regarding laboratory variables.
(1) Patients with severe leak are more likely to undergo reoperation. (2) Endocarditis was the most frequent cause of reoperation for any leak degree. (3) Severe prosthetic valve leak is more difficult to fully resolve after surgical treatment.
人工瓣膜漏是心脏瓣膜置换术后的一种可能并发症。虽然并不常见,但后果可能很严重。很少有研究将人工瓣膜漏的程度与临床事件相关联。
比较轻度/中度(Mi/Mo)或重度(Sev)人工瓣膜漏患者的术后结果。
在 1999 年至 2001 年间接受心脏瓣膜手术的 1350 例患者中,共选择了 185 例人工瓣膜漏患者。其中,58 例(37 名男性)患者在心脏瓣膜置换术的术前和/或术后期间出现人工瓣膜漏(36 例为 Mi/Mo 漏,22 例为 Sev 漏),他们的完整医疗记录数据可用,因此可以回顾性评估他们的临床、实验室和超声心动图数据。
Mi/Mo 组的再手术率为 11.1%,而 Sev 组为 22.7%(比值比=2.35[95%可信区间 0.56-9.94])。Mi/Mo 组中有 75%的患者和 Sev 组中有 60%的患者因感染性心内膜炎而需要再次手术。主动脉生物瓣是与漏相关的最常见的瓣膜(Mi/Mo 组为 55.8%,Sev 组为 57.7%)。在术后第 2 天,40%的 Mi/Mo 漏患者没有出现人工瓣膜漏,而 Sev 漏患者的这一比例为 21.4%。两组间实验室变量无显著差异。
(1)重度漏患者更有可能接受再次手术。(2)感染性心内膜炎是任何漏度再次手术的最常见原因。(3)严重的人工瓣膜漏在手术后更难以完全解决。