• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对不同年龄段的人书写中文时的任务因素可用性进行评级。

Task factor usability ratings for different age groups writing Chinese.

机构信息

Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2009 Nov;52(11):1372-85. doi: 10.1080/00140130903147714.

DOI:10.1080/00140130903147714
PMID:19851905
Abstract

This study evaluated how different task factors affect performance and user subjective preferences for three different age groups of Chinese subjects (6-11, 20-23, 65-70 years) when hand writing Chinese characters. The subjects copied Chinese character sentences with different settings for the task factors of writing plane angle (horizontal 0 degrees , slanted 15 degrees ), writing direction (horizontal, vertical), and line spacing (5 mm, 7 mm and no lines). Writing speed was measured and subjective preferences (effectiveness and satisfaction) were assessed for each of the task factor settings. The result showed that there was a conflict between writing speed and personal preference for the line spacing factor; 5 mm line spacing increased writing speed but it was the least preferred. It was also found that: vertical and horizontal writing directions and a slanted work surface suited school-aged children; a horizontal work surface and horizontal writing direction suited university students; and a horizontal writing direction with either a horizontal or slanted work surface suited the older adults.

摘要

本研究评估了不同任务因素如何影响三个不同年龄组(6-11 岁、20-23 岁、65-70 岁)的中国被试在手写汉字时的表现和用户主观偏好。被试者按照不同的任务因素(书写平面角度[水平 0 度、倾斜 15 度]、书写方向[水平、垂直]和行间距[5 毫米、7 毫米和无行间距])抄写汉字句子。测量了书写速度,并对每种任务因素设置的主观偏好(效果和满意度)进行了评估。结果表明,在书写速度和个人对线间距因素的偏好之间存在冲突;5 毫米的行间距增加了书写速度,但却是最不受欢迎的。研究还发现:垂直和水平的书写方向以及倾斜的工作面适合学龄儿童;水平的工作面和水平的书写方向适合大学生;而水平的书写方向和水平或倾斜的工作面则适合老年人。

相似文献

1
Task factor usability ratings for different age groups writing Chinese.针对不同年龄段的人书写中文时的任务因素可用性进行评级。
Ergonomics. 2009 Nov;52(11):1372-85. doi: 10.1080/00140130903147714.
2
Effects of different task factors on speed and preferences in Chinese handwriting.不同任务因素对中文手写速度和偏好的影响。
Ergonomics. 2005 Jan;48(1):38-54. doi: 10.1080/00140130412331303902.
3
Measuring the tilt and slant of Chinese handwriting in primary school students: A computerized approach.测量小学生汉字书写的倾斜和偏斜:一种计算机化的方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 4;14(11):e0223485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223485. eCollection 2019.
4
Effects of display factors on Chinese proofreading performance and preferences.显示因素对中文校对表现和偏好的影响。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(11):1316-30. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.714472. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
5
Optimized Motor Imagery Paradigm Based on Imagining Chinese Characters Writing Movement.基于想象汉字书写动作的优化运动想象范式
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Jul;25(7):1009-1017. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2655542. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1.键盘按键间距对打字速度、错误率、可用性和生物力学的影响:第 1 部分。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):557-66. doi: 10.1177/0018720812465005.
7
Progressive micrographia shown in horizontal, but not vertical, writing in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中水平书写而非垂直书写出现进行性小写症。
Behav Neurol. 2013;27(2):169-74. doi: 10.3233/BEN-120285.
8
Usability Evaluation of Slanted Computer Mice.斜式鼠标的可用性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083854.
9
Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) for Chinese children: Hong Kong Cohort.中国儿童功能独立性测量量表(简易版儿童功能独立性测量量表):香港队列研究
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E36. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.2.e36.
10
Effects of slanted ergonomic mice on task performance and subjective responses.斜式人体工学鼠标对任务表现和主观反应的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.运用模糊综合评价法确定产品可用性:一个提出的理论框架。
Work. 2017;56(1):9-19. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162474.