Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 2009 Dec;52(12):953-64. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20762.
Occupational injuries are common among nursing personnel. Most epidemiologic research on nursing aides comes from long-term care settings. Reports from acute care settings often combine data on nurses and aides even though their job requirements and personal characteristics are quite different. Our objective was to assess risk of work-related injuries in an acute care setting while contrasting injuries of aides and nurses.
A retrospective cohort of aides (n = 1,689) and nurses (n = 5,082) working in acute care at a large healthcare system between 1997 and 2004 were identified via personnel records. Workers' compensation filings were used to ascertain occupational injuries. Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Aides had higher overall injury rates than nurses for no-lost work time (RR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3) and lost work time (RR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1-3.8) injuries. The risk of an injury due to lifting was greater among aides compared to nurses for both non-lost work time and lost work time injuries. Injury rates among aides were particularly high in rehabilitation and orthopedics units. Most of the injuries requiring time away from work for both groups were related to the process of delivering direct patient care.
Our findings illustrate the importance of evaluating work-related injuries separately for aides and nurses, given differences in injury risk profiles and injury outcomes. It is particularly important that occupational safety needs of aides be addressed as this occupation experiences significant job growth.
职业伤害在护理人员中很常见。大多数关于护理助理的流行病学研究来自长期护理机构。来自急性护理环境的报告通常将护士和助理的数据合并在一起,尽管他们的工作要求和个人特征有很大的不同。我们的目的是评估在急性护理环境中工作相关伤害的风险,同时对比助理和护士的伤害情况。
通过人员记录,确定了 1997 年至 2004 年间在大型医疗保健系统中从事急性护理工作的护理助理(n=1689)和护士(n=5082)的回顾性队列。通过工人补偿申请来确定职业伤害。使用泊松回归估计率比(RR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。
在无旷工时间(RR=1.2,95%CI:1.1-1.3)和旷工时间(RR=2.8,95%CI:2.1-3.8)受伤方面,助理的总体受伤率高于护士。与护士相比,助理在因举重而受伤的风险更高,无论是无旷工时间还是旷工时间受伤。在康复和骨科病房,助理的受伤率尤其高。两组因工作需要离开工作岗位的大多数伤害都与直接提供患者护理的过程有关。
我们的研究结果表明,鉴于受伤风险概况和受伤结果的差异,分别评估助理和护士的工作相关伤害非常重要。由于该职业经历了显著的就业增长,因此特别需要解决助理的职业安全需求。