• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health care workers' experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis.医护人员遭遇的有患者和医护人员受伤风险的工作场所事件的经历:关键事件技术分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 27;21(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06517-x.
2
Home care workers' experiences of work conditions related to their occupational health: a qualitative study.家庭护理工作者对与其职业健康相关的工作条件的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06941-z.
3
Opportunities to strengthen resilience of health care workers regarding patient safety.加强医护人员在患者安全方面的韧性的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10054-0.
4
Occupational injuries among health care workers at a public hospital in Ghana.加纳一家公立医院医护人员的职业伤害。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jun 3;39:103. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.103.23542. eCollection 2021.
5
"Caminando Con Riesgo": perceptions of occupational injury, workplace safety and workers rights among Spanish-speaking hospitalized patients.“冒险前行”:西班牙语住院患者对职业伤害、工作场所安全和工人权利的认知。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;12:1347534. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347534. eCollection 2024.
6
Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia.工伤赔偿后对(再)受伤及重返工作岗位的恐惧:来自澳大利亚维多利亚州关键利益相关者的定性见解
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7.
7
Workforce implications of injury among home health workers: evidence from the National Home Health Aide Survey.家庭保健工人受伤对劳动力的影响:来自全国家庭保健助手调查的证据。
Gerontologist. 2012 Aug;52(4):493-505. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr133. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
8
Influence of multiple factors on the incidence of occupational blood and body fluid exposures in health care workers in Guizhou, China: A structural equation modeling approach.多种因素对中国贵州医护人员职业血液和体液暴露发生率的影响:一种结构方程建模方法。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Nov;43(11):e73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.014.
9
Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.工作场所中的大麻:职业健康专业人员和雇主指南:美国职业健康护士协会与美国职业与环境医学学院联合指南声明
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Apr;63(4):139-64. doi: 10.1177/2165079915581983. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Early detection of occupational stress: Enhancing workplace safety with machine learning and large language models.职业压力的早期检测:利用机器学习和大语言模型提升工作场所安全性
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0323265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323265. eCollection 2025.
2
Occupational injuries among healthcare workers: a nationwide study in Turkey.医护人员的职业伤害:土耳其的一项全国性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;12:1505331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1505331. eCollection 2024.
3
Association Between Physical Activity and the Risk of Burnout in Health Care Workers: Systematic Review.体力活动与医护人员倦怠风险的关联:系统综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Mar 18;10:e49772. doi: 10.2196/49772.
4
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review.医疗机构患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118.
5
Prevalence and Determinants of Work-Related Injuries Among Healthcare Workers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达市医护人员工作相关伤害的患病率及影响因素
Cureus. 2023 Mar 25;15(3):e36679. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36679. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Evaluation of the implementation and effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention strategy for safe patient handling and movement in the healthcare sector: a study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.评价医疗保健领域多因素干预策略在安全患者搬运和移动方面的实施和效果:一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e067693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067693.
7
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the risk assessment instrument TilThermometer for a Swedish version - patient handling in the healthcare sector.将风险评估工具 TilThermometer 翻译并跨文化适应为瑞典语版本 - 医疗保健行业的患者搬运。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 3;23(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05474-8.
8
Reported Incidents Involving Non-medical Care Workers and Nursery Teachers in Hospitals in Japan: An Analysis of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care Nationwide Database.日本医院非医疗护理人员和幼儿园教师相关事件报告:基于日本医疗质量全国理事会数据库的分析
Cureus. 2022 Feb 25;14(2):e22589. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22589. eCollection 2022 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical and Psychosocial Work Environmental Risk Factors for Back Injury among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.医护人员腰背损伤的物理和心理社会工作环境风险因素:前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224528.
2
Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;76(12):927-937. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105849. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
3
Managing risk in hazardous conditions: improvisation is not enough.在危险环境中管理风险:即兴发挥是不够的。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):60-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009443. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Psychological and Psychosomatic Symptoms of Second Victims of Adverse Events: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不良事件中第二受害者的心理和身心症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):e61-e74. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000589.
5
Patient and visitor aggression in healthcare: A survey exploring organisational safety culture and team efficacy.患者和访客在医疗保健中的攻击行为:一项调查探索组织安全文化和团队效能。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jul;27(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12772. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Protocol of a scoping review assessing injury rates and their determinants among healthcare workers in western countries.评估西方国家医护人员伤害率及其决定因素的范围审查方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e023372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023372.
7
The Critical Incident Technique: Method or Methodology?关键事件技术:方法还是方法论?
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1065-1079. doi: 10.1177/1049732318813112. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
The Impact of Adverse Events on Clinicians: What's in a Name?不良事件对临床医生的影响:名字有何含义?
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):65-72. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000256.
9
Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.医护人员针刺伤的临床、经济和人文负担。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Sep 29;10:225-235. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140846. eCollection 2017.
10
Lessons learned for reducing the negative impact of adverse events on patients, health professionals and healthcare organizations.为减少不良事件对患者、卫生专业人员和医疗保健组织的负面影响而吸取的经验教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):450-460. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx056.

医护人员遭遇的有患者和医护人员受伤风险的工作场所事件的经历:关键事件技术分析。

Health care workers' experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis.

机构信息

University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 27;21(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06517-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06517-x
PMID:34044852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8157721/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of occupational injuries and approximately 10-15% of patients are affected by an adverse event during their hospital stay. There is scarce scientific literature about how HCWs manage these risks in practice and what support they need. This knowledge is needed to improve safety for patients and HCWs. This study explores HCWs' experiences of workplace incidents that led to injury or posed a risk of patient and worker injury, with focus on HCWs' emotions and actions.

METHODS

This study employed a qualitative design using the critical incident technique. Semi-structured individual interviews were held with 34 HCWs from three regions in Sweden. Data were analysed using inductive category development.

RESULTS

Altogether 71 workplace incidents were reported. The analysis of two dimensions - the emotions HCWs feel and the actions team members and managers take when a workplace incident occurs - yielded two categories each: Anxiety during the incident, Persistent distress after the incident, Team interplay for safety actions and Support and ratification from managers and colleagues. Health care workers risked their own safety and health to provide patient safety. Teamwork and trustful relationships were critical for patient and worker safety. Support and validation from colleagues and managers were important for closure; unsatisfactory manager response and insufficient opportunities to debrief the incident could lead to persistent negative emotions. Participants described insecurity and fear, sadness over being injured at work, and shame and self-regret when the patient or themselves were injured. When the workplace had not taken the expected action, they felt anger and resignation, often turning into long-term distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Work situations leading to injury or risk of patient and worker injury are emotionally distressing for HCWs. Team interplay may facilitate safe and dynamic practices and help HCWs overcome negative emotions. Organizational support is imperative for individual closure. For safety in health care, employers need to develop strategies for active management of risks, avoiding injuries and providing support after an injury.

摘要

背景

医护人员(HCWs)面临着职业伤害的高风险,大约有 10-15%的患者在住院期间会遭受不良事件的影响。关于 HCWs 在实践中如何管理这些风险以及他们需要什么支持,相关科学文献很少。这方面的知识对于提高患者和 HCWs 的安全性是必要的。本研究探讨了 HCWs 遭遇导致受伤或对患者和工人受伤构成风险的工作场所事件的经历,重点关注 HCWs 的情绪和行为。

方法

本研究采用定性设计,使用关键事件技术。对来自瑞典三个地区的 34 名 HCWs 进行了半结构化的个体访谈。使用归纳类别开发对数据进行分析。

结果

共报告了 71 起工作场所事件。对 HCWs 在工作场所事件发生时感受到的情绪和团队成员及管理人员采取的行动这两个维度的分析,分别得出了两个类别:事件发生时的焦虑、事件发生后的持续困扰、团队为安全行动而进行的互动以及来自管理人员和同事的支持和认可。HCWs 冒着自身安全和健康的风险来保障患者安全。团队合作和信任关系对患者和工人的安全至关重要。同事和管理人员的支持和认可对于事件的结束至关重要;管理人员反应不佳和没有足够的机会对事件进行反思可能会导致持续的负面情绪。参与者描述了他们在工作场所没有采取预期行动时感到的愤怒和无奈,以及在自己或患者受伤时感到的悲伤、内疚和自责。

结论

导致受伤或患者和工人受伤风险的工作情况会给 HCWs 带来情绪困扰。团队互动可以促进安全和动态的实践,并帮助 HCWs 克服负面情绪。组织支持对于个人结束事件至关重要。为了保证医疗保健的安全,雇主需要制定积极管理风险、避免伤害以及在受伤后提供支持的策略。