Maguranyi Suzann K, Webb Cameron E, Mansfield Sarah, Russell Richard C
Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Sep;25(3):292-300. doi: 10.2987/09-0016.1.
While the use of topical insect repellents, particularly those containing synthetic active ingredients such as deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), are a mainstay in personal protection strategies emphasized in public health messages, there is a growing demand in the community for alternative repellents, particularly those of botanical origin and thus deemed to be "natural." This study evaluated the repellency of essential oils from 11 Australian native plants in 5% v/v formulations against Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Culex annulirostris under laboratory conditions. A blend of the top 3 performing oils was then compared with deet and a commercially available botanical insect repellent. All essential oils provided at least some protection against the 3 mosquito species, with the longest protection time (110 min) afforded by Prostanthera melissifolia against Cx. quinquefasciatus. Mean protection times against Ae. aegypti were substantially lower than those for the Culex spp. tested. Deet provided significantly longer protection against Ae. aegypti than both the 5% v/v blend of Leptospermum petersonii, Prostanthera melissifolia, and Melaleuca alternifolia (the 3 most effective oils) and the commercial botanical repellent. The results of this study indicate that these essential oils from Australian native plants offer limited protection against biting mosquitoes and that a blend of essential oils holds may offer commercial potential as a short-period repellent or under conditions of low mosquito abundance. However, it is important that public health messages continue to emphasize the greater effectiveness of deet-based repellents in areas with risks of mosquito-borne disease.
虽然使用局部驱虫剂,特别是那些含有合成活性成分如避蚊胺(N,N - 二乙基 - 3 - 甲基苯甲酰胺)的驱虫剂,是公共卫生信息中强调的个人防护策略的主要手段,但社区对替代驱虫剂的需求日益增长,特别是那些植物源的、因此被认为是“天然”的驱虫剂。本研究在实验室条件下评估了11种澳大利亚本土植物的5%(v/v)配方精油对埃及伊蚊、致倦库蚊和环喙库蚊的驱避效果。然后将表现最佳的3种精油的混合物与避蚊胺和一种市售植物性驱虫剂进行比较。所有精油对这3种蚊虫都至少提供了一定程度的防护,其中密花毛塔花对致倦库蚊的防护时间最长(110分钟)。对埃及伊蚊的平均防护时间显著低于所测试的库蚊属蚊虫。避蚊胺对埃及伊蚊的防护时间明显长于5%(v/v)的彼得森氏细籽桉、密花毛塔花和互叶白千层(3种最有效的精油)混合物以及市售植物性驱虫剂。本研究结果表明,这些澳大利亚本土植物的精油对叮咬蚊虫的防护作用有限,精油混合物作为短期驱虫剂或在蚊虫数量较少的情况下可能具有商业潜力。然而,重要的是公共卫生信息应继续强调在有蚊媒疾病风险的地区,以避蚊胺为基础的驱虫剂具有更高的有效性。