Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Smithfield, Australia.
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Papua, New Guinea.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Aug 14;109(3):690-697. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0089. Print 2023 Sep 6.
Mosquito repellents are important for personal protection against nuisance and potentially infectious mosquito bites. Repellent activity of Australian blue cypress essential oil (EO) and a commercially formulated skin lotion containing blue cypress EO (topical formulation) were compared with 20% DEET (N, N-diethyl-3 toluamide) against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions in North Queensland, Australia. On a volunteer's forearm, 1 mL of candidate material was applied to approximately 600 cm2 of exposed skin. When blue cypress EO was applied at various concentrations (0.5%-10.5%), it did not fully prevent mosquito landing or biting. However, a dose-dependent increase, approaching 80% protection, was observed at high EO concentrations. On the basis of these results, three concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) of blue cypress EO were selected for complete protection time (CPT) experiments. Topical formulation (undiluted) was also included in CPT experiments. Although some protection was afforded, mosquito landing/probing were still recorded immediately after application for both blue cypress EO and its topical formulation. Specifically, protection declined for blue cypress EO from 80% to 70% (laboratory) and from 93% to 50% (field) within 1 hour. For topical formulation, protection declined from 85% to 75% in the laboratory and from 63% to 50% in the field. In comparison, DEET maintained a 100% protection throughout the testing period of up to 1 h, and there was no landing/probing observed in volunteers who had applied DEET. To conclude, both blue cypress products provided some protection against mosquito bites, which decreased soon after application.
驱蚊剂对于个人免受蚊虫滋扰和潜在传染性蚊虫叮咬非常重要。在澳大利亚北昆士兰州的实验室和现场条件下,比较了蓝柏木精油(EO)和含有蓝柏木 EO 的商业配方皮肤乳液(局部配方)的驱蚊活性与 20%避蚊胺(N,N-二乙基-3-甲苯酰胺),以评估其对蚊子的效果。在志愿者的前臂上,将 1 毫升候选材料涂抹在大约 600 平方厘米的暴露皮肤上。当蓝柏木 EO 以不同浓度(0.5%-10.5%)使用时,它不能完全防止蚊子降落或叮咬。然而,在高 EO 浓度下,观察到剂量依赖性增加,接近 80%的保护。基于这些结果,选择了三个浓度(5%、10%和 20%)的蓝柏木 EO 进行完全保护时间(CPT)实验。局部配方(未稀释)也包含在 CPT 实验中。尽管提供了一些保护,但在应用后立即记录到蓝柏木 EO 和其局部配方的蚊子降落/探查。具体来说,蓝柏木 EO 的保护作用从 80%降至 70%(实验室)和从 93%降至 50%(现场),在 1 小时内。对于局部配方,保护作用从 85%降至 75%(实验室)和从 63%降至 50%(现场)。相比之下,避蚊胺在整个测试期间保持 100%的保护,涂抹避蚊胺的志愿者没有观察到蚊子降落或探查。总之,两种蓝柏木产品都提供了一些针对蚊子叮咬的保护,但在应用后很快就会减弱。