心脏病学与医疗实践质量。心脏病学工作组。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Cardiology and the quality of medical practice. The Cardiology Working Group.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991;265(4):482-5; discussion 496-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03460040072032.

DOI:10.1001/jama.1991.03460040072032

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

Cardiology and the quality of medical practice. The Cardiology Working Group.心脏病学与医疗实践质量。心脏病学工作组。

JAMA. 1991;265(4):482-5; discussion 496-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03460040072032.

2

Physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines: does it really matter?医生对临床实践指南的遵循：这真的重要吗？

Am Heart J. 2003 Jan;145(1):13-5. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.25.

3

Operator volume as a "risk factor".操作人员数量作为一个“风险因素”。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Oct;30(4):878-80. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00273-8.

4

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention choices in patients with similar coronary anatomy: A computer-based simulation examines the sex gap.冠状动脉解剖结构相似的患者在冠状动脉旁路移植术和直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之间的选择：一项基于计算机的模拟研究性别差异。

Can J Cardiol. 2009 Nov;25(11):649-53. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70162-x.

5

Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG?临床试验与临床实践：当证据与实践出现分歧时——三支血管病变且患有稳定型缺血性心脏病的非糖尿病患者是否应优先接受冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）治疗？

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1647-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.020.

6

The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group: a regional collaborative effort for continuous quality improvement in cardiovascular disease.新英格兰北部心血管疾病研究小组：为心血管疾病持续质量改进开展的区域协作努力。

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Oct;24(10):594-600. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30408-4.

7

Controversies in cardiology.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 Mar;5(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Jan 31.

8

Advancing recognition of the responsibilities of cardiac sonographers.对心脏超声检查技师职责的认识不断提高。

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Dec;22(12):1414-6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.10.003.

9

[Commentary on the guidelines the diagnosis and the therapy of syncope--the European Society of Cardiology 2001 and the update 2004].[晕厥诊断与治疗指南解读——欧洲心脏病学会2001年版及2004年更新版]

Z Kardiol. 2005 Sep;94(9):592-612. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0230-5.

10

[Statement of the Working Group of the Germany Society on the safety of asynchronous ventricular pacemaker stimulation ].[德国协会工作组关于异步心室起搏器刺激安全性的声明]

Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):57-60. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0309-7.

引用本文的文献

1

Geographic variation in health care utilization and outcomes in veterans with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死退伍军人医疗保健利用情况和结局的地域差异。

J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):604-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11048.x.

2

Outcomes research in the development and evaluation of practice guidelines.实践指南制定与评估中的结果研究。

BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Mar 25;2(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-7.

3

Assessing the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: the University of Maryland Revascularization Appropriateness Score (RAS) and its comparison to RAND expert panel ratings and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines with regard to assigned appropriateness rating and ability to predict outcome.评估冠状动脉血运重建的适宜性：马里兰大学血运重建适宜性评分（RAS）及其与兰德专家小组评级以及美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南在指定适宜性评级和预测结果能力方面的比较。

Clin Cardiol. 1999 Feb;22(2):67-76. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960220204.