Interdisciplinary Musculoskeletal Pain Assessment and Community Treatment Service, Haywood Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent PCT & Centre for Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Feb;48(2):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Psychologically-based interventions for chronic pain traditionally include a mix of methods, including physical conditioning, training in relaxation or attention control, strategies to decrease irrational or dysfunctional thinking patterns, and activity management training. Recent developments suggest additional methods to promote acceptance, mindfulness, values-based action, and cognitive defusion (a cognitive process entailing change in the influences exerted by thoughts without necessarily changing their form or frequency). Collectively, these processes entail what is referred to as psychological flexibility. This study examined how changes in traditionally conceived methods of coping compare to changes in psychological flexibility in relation to improvements in functioning over the course of an interdisciplinary treatment program. Participants were 114 chronic pain sufferers. Results indicated that changes in the traditionally conceived methods were essentially unrelated to treatment improvements, while changes in psychological flexibility were consistently and significantly related to these improvements. We suggest that psychological flexibility appears highly relevant to the study of chronic pain and to future treatment developments. The utility of more traditionally conceived pain management strategies, on the other hand, may require a reappraisal.
基于心理学的慢性疼痛干预传统上包括多种方法,包括身体锻炼、放松或注意力控制训练、减少不合理或功能失调思维模式的策略,以及活动管理训练。最近的发展表明,有额外的方法可以促进接受、正念、基于价值观的行动和认知解离(一种认知过程,涉及改变思想的影响,而不必改变其形式或频率)。这些过程共同构成了所谓的心理灵活性。本研究考察了在跨学科治疗计划的过程中,与功能改善相关的传统应对方法的变化与心理灵活性的变化相比,如何发生变化。参与者是 114 名慢性疼痛患者。结果表明,传统应对方法的变化与治疗改善基本无关,而心理灵活性的变化则与这些改善始终保持一致且显著相关。我们认为,心理灵活性似乎与慢性疼痛的研究和未来的治疗发展密切相关。另一方面,更传统的疼痛管理策略的效用可能需要重新评估。