• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新社会科学研究对患者安全的贡献。

The contribution of new social science research to patient safety.

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, The Nordic School of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1780-3. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.053. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.053
PMID:19853338
Abstract

Social sciences have given much to the science and practice of patient safety, but have more to offer. The purposes of this paper are to give a background to the studies presented in this special issue, and to encourage more social scientist to contribute to this important and rapidly growing field. This is largely preaching to the converted - there is one other purpose which may be achieved if more traditional medical researchers and reviewers see this special issue. That is to show how social sciences help to understand, explain and address many issues which traditional medical research methods are not designed to penetrate. This special issue shows the value of social science patient safety research, and gives a reference point for future researchers in making proposals, designing research and comparing their findings. It highlights areas which this research needs to address in its methods, presentation, and subjects studied.

摘要

社会科学为患者安全的科学和实践做出了很大贡献,但还有更多的贡献可以做出。本文的目的是为本期特刊中呈现的研究提供背景,并鼓励更多的社会科学家为这一重要且快速发展的领域做出贡献。这在很大程度上是对已接受的观点的再次强调——如果更多的传统医学研究人员和评论人员看到本期特刊,可能会达到另一个目的。这就是展示社会科学如何帮助理解、解释和解决许多传统医学研究方法无法深入研究的问题。本期特刊展示了社会科学患者安全研究的价值,并为未来的研究人员提出建议、设计研究和比较研究结果提供了参考点。它突出了该研究在方法、呈现和研究对象方面需要解决的领域。

相似文献

1
The contribution of new social science research to patient safety.新社会科学研究对患者安全的贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1780-3. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.053. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
2
Social scientists and patient safety: critics or contributors?社会科学家与患者安全:批评者还是贡献者?
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1777-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.046. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
3
Research methods from social science can contribute much to the health sciences.社会科学的研究方法能对健康科学做出很大贡献。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):519-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.014.
4
New approaches to researching patient safety.研究患者安全的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1701-4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.050. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
5
Sociological refigurations of patient safety; ontologies of improvement and 'acting with' quality collaboratives in healthcare.社会学对患者安全的重新构想;医疗保健中改进和“与”质量协作体的本体论。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.049. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.当我们看到“好的”定性研究时,我们如何识别它?开启卫生服务研究中的对话。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88.
8
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design.患者安全研究的认识论:研究设计与解读框架。第二部分。研究设计。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):163-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023648.
9
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement.患者安全研究的认识论:研究设计与解读框架。第3部分。终点与测量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):170-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023655.
10
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Limited external reproducibility restricts the use of medical record review for benchmarking.有限的外部可重复性限制了将病历审查用于基准测试。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 25;8(2):e000564. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000564. eCollection 2019.
2
The struggle against perceived negligence. A qualitative study of patients' experiences of adverse events in Norwegian hospitals.对抗医疗过失的斗争。一项关于挪威医院患者不良事件经历的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 25;18(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3101-2.
3
Problematisations of Complexity: On the Notion and Production of Diverse Complexities in Healthcare Interventions and Evaluations.
复杂性的问题化:论医疗保健干预与评估中多样复杂性的概念及产生
Sci Cult (Lond). 2017 Apr 3;26(2):135-160. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2016.1212003. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Incident reporting systems: a comparative study of two hospital divisions.事件报告系统:两个医院科室的比较研究
Arch Public Health. 2016 Aug 15;74:34. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0146-8. eCollection 2016.
5
Health Technology Assessment of pathogen reduction technologies applied to plasma for clinical use.应用于临床用血制品的病原体灭活技术的卫生技术评估。
Blood Transfus. 2016 Jul;14(4):287-386. doi: 10.2450/2016.0065-16.
6
Exploring approaches to patient safety: the case of spinal manipulation therapy.探索患者安全的方法:以脊柱推拿疗法为例。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Jun 2;16:164. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1149-2.
7
Analysing 'big picture' policy reform mechanisms: the Australian health service safety and quality accreditation scheme.分析“宏观”政策改革机制:澳大利亚医疗服务安全与质量认证计划
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3110-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12300. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
Seeing it from both sides: do approaches to involving patients in improving their safety risk damaging the trust between patients and healthcare professionals? An interview study.从双方视角看问题:让患者参与改善其安全风险的方法是否会破坏患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的信任?一项访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 6;8(11):e80759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080759. eCollection 2013.
9
Measuring the impact of a health information exchange intervention on provider-based notifiable disease reporting using mixed methods: a study protocol.采用混合方法衡量健康信息交换干预对基于提供者的应报告传染病报告的影响:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Oct 30;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-121.
10
Professional conceptualisation and accomplishment of patient safety in mental healthcare: an ethnographic approach.精神卫生保健中的患者安全的专业概念化和实现:一种民族志方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 14;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-100.