• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Morphologic characterization of preoperatively treated prostate cancer: toward a post-therapy histologic classification.术前治疗前列腺癌的形态学特征:走向治疗后组织学分类。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1030-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
2
Post prostatectomy outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen blockade.接受新辅助雄激素阻断治疗的高危前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后的结局。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Sep;21(3):364-372. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0009-6. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation in patients with clinical high risk prostate cancer and pT3 surgical margin positive disease.临床高危前列腺癌且 pT3 手术切缘阳性患者接受根治性前列腺切除术加辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的预后预测因素。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2572. Epub 2012 May 12.
5
Atypical cribriform lesions of the prostate: relationship to prostatic carcinoma and implication for diagnosis in prostate biopsies.前列腺非典型筛状病变:与前列腺癌的关系及其对前列腺活检诊断的影响。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Apr;34(4):470-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cfc44b.
6
Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后早期前列腺特异性抗原复发:基于术前和术后肿瘤特征的预测
Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):21-30. doi: 10.1159/000019922.
7
GBX2 Methylation Is a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Improves Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence Among Patients with Prostate Cancer Negative for Intraductal Carcinoma and Cribriform Architecture.GBX2 甲基化是一种新的预后生物标志物,可改善对非导管内癌和筛状结构的前列腺癌患者生化复发的预测。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 May;2(3):231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
8
Differential response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: Predictive morphological parameters and molecular markers.前列腺癌对新辅助激素治疗的差异反应:预测性形态学参数和分子标志物
Prostate. 2019 May;79(7):709-719. doi: 10.1002/pros.23777. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
9
Stage T3 prostate cancer: a nonrandomized comparison between definitive irradiation and induction hormonal manipulation plus prostatectomy.T3期前列腺癌:根治性放疗与诱导激素治疗加前列腺切除术的非随机对照研究
Urology. 1998 May;51(5):782-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00022-3.
10
Adjuvant radiation therapy, androgen deprivation, and docetaxel for high-risk prostate cancer postprostatectomy: Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG study 0621.辅助放疗、雄激素剥夺治疗及多西他赛用于前列腺癌根治术后高危前列腺癌:NRG肿瘤学/放射肿瘤学组(RTOG)0621研究结果
Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;123(13):2489-2496. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30620. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermediate risk prostate tumors contain lethal subtypes.中度风险前列腺肿瘤包含致死性亚型。
Front Urol. 2024;4. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1487873. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
2
Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma subtypes and postoperative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.导管内癌亚型及术后放疗对局限性前列腺癌的预后价值
BMC Urol. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01690-1.
3
Long non-coding RNAs: regulators of autophagy and potential biomarkers in therapy resistance and urological cancers.长链非编码RNA:自噬的调节因子以及治疗耐药性和泌尿系统癌症中的潜在生物标志物。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1442227. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1442227. eCollection 2024.
4
Cribriform versus Intraductal: How to Determine the Difference.筛状型与导管内型:如何确定差异
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 24;16(11):2002. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112002.
5
Molecular complexity of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.前列腺导管内癌的分子复杂性。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(2):e6939. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6939.
6
Nomogram for predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.列线图预测前列腺导管内癌患者的总生存和癌症特异性生存。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 28;150(2):45. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05582-5.
7
Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: To Grade or Not to Grade.前列腺导管内癌:分级与否
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 7;15(22):5319. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225319.
8
DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology.前列腺癌中的 DNA 损伤修复途径:精准肿瘤学中分子机制、新兴生物标志物和治疗靶点的叙事性综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 13;24(14):11418. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411418.
9
Nomogram for predicting the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗后前列腺癌生化复发的预测列线图。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Sep;55(9):2215-2224. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03658-2. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.前列腺中的筛状病变:着重于鉴别诊断及临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 21;14(13):3041. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133041.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge discovery processing and data mining in karyometry.核测量中的知识发现处理与数据挖掘
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2009 Jun;31(3):125-36.
2
Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences.根治性前列腺切除术的阳性切缘:问题概述及其长期后果。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.051. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Neoadjuvant docetaxel treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer: a clinicopathologic study.多西他赛新辅助治疗局部晚期前列腺癌:一项临床病理研究
Cancer. 2007 Sep 15;110(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22897.
4
A proposal on the identification, histologic reporting, and implications of intraductal prostatic carcinoma.关于导管内前列腺癌的识别、组织学报告及意义的一项提议。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Jul;131(7):1103-9. doi: 10.5858/2007-131-1103-APOTIH.
5
Initial modulation of the tumor microenvironment accounts for thalidomide activity in prostate cancer.肿瘤微环境的初始调节是沙利度胺在前列腺癌中发挥作用的原因。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15;13(4):1224-31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1938.
6
African-American men with nonpalpable prostate cancer exhibit greater tumor volume than matched white men.患有不可触及前列腺癌的非裔美国男性比配对的白人男性表现出更大的肿瘤体积。
Cancer. 2006 Jul 1;107(1):75-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21954.
7
The evolving role of chemotherapy and other systemic therapies for managing localized prostate cancer.化疗及其他全身治疗在局限性前列腺癌管理中的角色演变
J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 2):S28-32; discussion S33-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000095356.02647.64.
8
A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume.一种简化的三维体积估计方法可根据体积准确分类前列腺肿瘤。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Oct;27(10):1291-301. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200310000-00001.
9
Pathologic effects of neoadjuvant cyproterone acetate on nonneoplastic prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a detailed analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens from a randomized trial.新辅助醋酸环丙孕酮对非肿瘤性前列腺、前列腺上皮内瘤变及腺癌的病理影响:一项随机试验中前列腺癌根治术标本的详细分析
Am J Surg Pathol. 2002 Nov;26(11):1400-13. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200211000-00002.
10
Effects of complete androgen blockade for 12 and 24 weeks on the pathological stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer.12周和24周完全雄激素阻断对前列腺癌病理分期及手术切缘状态的影响。
J Clin Pathol. 2002 Jul;55(7):508-13. doi: 10.1136/jcp.55.7.508.

术前治疗前列腺癌的形态学特征:走向治疗后组织学分类。

Morphologic characterization of preoperatively treated prostate cancer: toward a post-therapy histologic classification.

机构信息

University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1030-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.020
PMID:19853370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2962710/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) changes morphology of residual tumors so that the Gleason score is no longer valid.

OBJECTIVE

To codify morphologic features of preoperatively treated PCa and identify potential classifiers predictive of outcome.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a detailed morphologic evaluation of specimens obtained from 115 patients with high-risk PCa who had preoperative androgen ablation, alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

MEASUREMENTS

Included hierarchical clustering analysis of morphologic characteristics, associations with other pathologic parameters, and univariate and multivariate analyses in search for associations with disease outcome.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Based on hierarchical clustering analysis, we categorized pretreated prostate cancer in three morphologically distinct groups: group A, characterized by a predominance of cell clusters, cell cords, and isolated cells; group B tumors, by intact and fused small glands; and group C tumors by any degree of cribriform growth pattern or intraductal tumor spread. Univariate analysis identified associations between this grouping, pathologic tumor stage (p<0.01) and residual tumor volume (p<0.001). Presence of intraductal spread or cribriform pattern in biopsies was associated with group C tumors. The presence of cribriform or intraductal spread morphology and positive surgical margins were stronger predictors of biochemical relapse than pathologic stage on multivariate analysis. The number of specimens evaluated in this study was limited, and a prospective validation is warranted along with molecular studies to validate the proposed morphologic classifier.

CONCLUSIONS

If validated, this classification will introduce uniformity in the selection of tissue samples for biomarker studies, facilitate the comparison of trials among different institutions, and may provide a new prognostic tool for preoperatively treated PCa.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌(PCa)的术前治疗改变了残留肿瘤的形态,使得 Gleason 评分不再有效。

目的

对接受过术前治疗的 PCa 标本进行形态学特征分析,并确定潜在的预测预后的分类器。

设计、地点和参与者:我们对 115 例接受过术前雄激素剥夺治疗(单独或联合化疗)的高危 PCa 患者的标本进行了详细的形态学评估。

测量

包括形态特征的层次聚类分析、与其他病理参数的关联,以及单变量和多变量分析,以寻找与疾病结果相关的关联。

结果和局限性

基于层次聚类分析,我们将预处理后的前列腺癌分为三种形态学上明显不同的组:A 组以细胞簇、细胞索和孤立细胞为主;B 组肿瘤以完整和融合的小腺体为特征;C 组肿瘤则具有任何程度的筛状生长模式或管内肿瘤扩散。单变量分析确定了这种分组与病理肿瘤分期(p<0.01)和残留肿瘤体积(p<0.001)之间的关联。活检中存在管内扩散或筛状模式与 C 组肿瘤有关。在多变量分析中,存在筛状或管内扩散形态和阳性手术切缘比病理分期是生化复发更强的预测因素。本研究评估的标本数量有限,需要前瞻性验证,并结合分子研究验证所提出的形态学分类器。

结论

如果得到验证,这种分类方法将在选择生物标志物研究的组织样本方面引入一致性,促进不同机构之间的试验比较,并可能为术前治疗的 PCa 提供新的预后工具。