Takacs Maria, Banati Ferenc, Koroknai Anita, Segesdi Judit, Salamon Daniel, Wolf Hans, Niller Hans Helmut, Minarovits Janos
Division of Virology, National Center for Epidemiology, H-1097 Budapest, Gyali ut 2-6, Hungary.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Mar-Apr;1799(3-4):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
Epigenotypes are modified cellular or viral genotypes that differ in transcriptional activity in spite of having an identical or nearly identical DNA sequence. Restricted expression of latent, episomal Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genomes is a consequence of a series of epigenetic modifications. In tight latency, there is no virus production (lytic viral replication, associated with the expression of all viral genes), and only a limited set of viral promoters is activated in a host-cell-dependent manner. The latent EBV promoters control the expression of growth-transformation-associated viral genes. The role of major epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of latent EBV promoters is variable. DNA methylation contributes to silencing of Wp and Cp (alternative promoters for transcripts coding for nuclear antigens EBNA 1-6) and LMP1p, LMP2Ap and LMP2Bp (promoters for transcripts encoding transmembrane proteins). DNA methylation does not control, however, Qp (a promoter for EBNA1 transcripts only) in B lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs, immortalized by EBV in vitro), although in vitro methylated Qp-reporter gene constructs are silenced. The invariably unmethylated Qp is probably switched off by binding of a repressor protein in LCLs. Histone modifications may also contribute to the regulation of latent EBV promoters because the active Cp, Qp and LMP2Ap promoters that are marked by strong binding of cellular regulatory proteins are located on "acetylation islands" enriched in diacetylated histone H3 and tetraacetylated histone H4. We speculate that binding of the chromatin insulator protein CTCF to 3 distinct sites (within, close to and far from the matrix attachment region) may contribute to the three-dimensional organization of the viral episomes. We also raise the point that latent EBV episomes may relocate to new nuclear subcompartments before the start of lytic EBV replication. We propose that a similar relocation of EBV episomes may result in a promoter switch (from Qp to Cp) due to the access of Cp to a B-lymphoblast-specific transcription factory when in vitro cultivated Burkitt's lymphoma cells undergo a phenotypic drift.
表观基因型是经过修饰的细胞或病毒基因型,尽管其DNA序列相同或几乎相同,但转录活性却有所不同。潜伏性附加型爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)基因组的受限表达是一系列表观遗传修饰的结果。在紧密潜伏状态下,不产生病毒(与所有病毒基因表达相关的裂解性病毒复制),并且只有一组有限的病毒启动子以宿主细胞依赖的方式被激活。潜伏性EBV启动子控制与生长转化相关的病毒基因的表达。主要表观遗传机制在潜伏性EBV启动子调控中的作用各不相同。DNA甲基化有助于Wp和Cp(编码核抗原EBNA 1-6的转录本的替代启动子)以及LMP1p、LMP2Ap和LMP2Bp(编码跨膜蛋白的转录本的启动子)的沉默。然而,在B淋巴母细胞系(LCLs,体外由EBV永生化)中,DNA甲基化并不控制Qp(仅EBNA1转录本的启动子),尽管体外甲基化的Qp报告基因构建体被沉默。在LCLs中,始终未甲基化的Qp可能通过阻遏蛋白的结合而被关闭。组蛋白修饰也可能有助于潜伏性EBV启动子的调控,因为被细胞调节蛋白强烈结合所标记的活跃Cp、Qp和LMP2Ap启动子位于富含二乙酰化组蛋白H3和四乙酰化组蛋白H4的“乙酰化岛”上。我们推测染色质绝缘子蛋白CTCF与3个不同位点(在基质附着区域内、附近和远离处)的结合可能有助于病毒附加体的三维组织。我们还提出,在裂解性EBV复制开始之前,潜伏性EBV附加体可能会重新定位到新的核亚区室。我们认为,当体外培养的伯基特淋巴瘤细胞发生表型漂移时,EBV附加体的类似重新定位可能会由于Cp进入B淋巴细胞特异性转录工厂而导致启动子切换(从Qp到Cp)。