• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项提高城市低收入母亲母乳喂养率的基于社区的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled community-based trial to improve breastfeeding rates among urban low-income mothers.

机构信息

York College of Pennsylvania, 17403, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2009.07.005
PMID:19854119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818063/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether providing a breastfeeding support team results in higher breastfeeding rates at 6, 12, and 24 weeks postpartum among urban low-income mothers.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial with mother-infant dyads recruited from 2 urban hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Breastfeeding mothers of full-term infants who were eligible for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (n=328) were randomized to intervention (n=168) or usual-care group (n=160).

INTERVENTION

The 24-week intervention included hospital visits by a breastfeeding support team, home visits, telephone support, and 24-hour pager access. The usual-care group received standard care.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Breastfeeding status was assessed by self-report at 6, 12, and 24 weeks postpartum.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the sociodemographic characteristics between the groups: 87% were African American, 80% single, and 51% primiparous. Compared with the usual-care group, more women reported breastfeeding in the intervention at 6 weeks postpartum, 66.7% vs 56.9% (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.76). The difference in rates at 12 weeks postpartum, 49.4% vs 40.6%, and 24 weeks postpartum, 29.2% vs 28.1%, were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention group was more likely to be breastfeeding at 6 weeks postpartum compared with the usual-care group, a time that coincided with the most intensive part of the intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估为城市低收入母亲提供母乳喂养支持团队是否会提高产后 6、12 和 24 周的母乳喂养率。

设计

这是一项在 2 家城市医院招募母婴对的随机对照试验。

参与者

符合妇女、婴儿和儿童特殊补充营养计划(WIC)资格的足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲(n=328)被随机分配至干预组(n=168)或常规护理组(n=160)。

干预

24 周的干预包括母乳喂养支持团队的医院访视、家访、电话支持和 24 小时传呼访问。常规护理组接受标准护理。

结局测量

产后 6、12 和 24 周通过自我报告评估母乳喂养状况。

结果

两组的社会人口学特征无差异:87%为非裔美国人,80%为单身,51%为初产妇。与常规护理组相比,更多的女性在产后 6 周报告母乳喂养,66.7%比 56.9%(优势比,1.71;95%置信区间,1.07-2.76)。产后 12 周和 24 周的母乳喂养率差异无统计学意义,分别为 49.4%比 40.6%和 29.2%比 28.1%。

结论

与常规护理组相比,干预组在产后 6 周时更有可能进行母乳喂养,此时恰逢干预的最密集阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eac/2818063/bb5b1586354a/nihms-135926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eac/2818063/bb5b1586354a/nihms-135926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eac/2818063/bb5b1586354a/nihms-135926-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled community-based trial to improve breastfeeding rates among urban low-income mothers.一项提高城市低收入母亲母乳喂养率的基于社区的随机对照试验。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
2
Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: a prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs.在早期、常规、预防性访视期间,由经过培训的临床医生提供的母乳喂养支持的效果:一项针对226对母婴的前瞻性、随机、开放试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e139-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1362.
3
Are 2 weeks of daily breastfeeding support insufficient to overcome the influences of formula?2 周的每日母乳喂养支持不足以克服配方奶的影响吗?
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.014.
4
Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.产后访视日程安排。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 21;7(7):CD009326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009326.pub4.
5
Effectiveness of a breastfeeding promotion intervention model based on Society ecosystems Theory for maternal women: a study protocol of randomized controlled trial.基于社会生态系统理论的母乳喂养促进干预模式对产妇有效性的研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Reprod Health. 2023 Dec 7;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01719-4.
6
Costs related to promoting breastfeeding among urban low-income women.与在城市低收入女性中推广母乳喂养相关的成本。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;41(1):144-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01316.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Clinician support and psychosocial risk factors associated with breastfeeding discontinuation.与母乳喂养中断相关的临床医生支持和心理社会风险因素。
Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):108-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.108.
8
Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese.针对超重或肥胖女性的支持母乳喂养启动和持续进行的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):CD012099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012099.pub2.
9
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Innovative Postpartum Care Model for Mother-Baby Dyads.母婴二元组创新产后护理模式的随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148520. eCollection 2016.
10
Effect of Financial Incentives on Breastfeeding: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对母乳喂养的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 5;172(2):e174523. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4523.

引用本文的文献

1
Breastfeeding interventions for preventing postpartum depression.预防产后抑郁症的母乳喂养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 18;2(2):CD014833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014833.pub2.
2
Cost-benefit analysis of a multicomponent breastfeeding promotion and support intervention in a developing country.发展中国家多组分母乳喂养促进和支持干预的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0295194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295194. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of clinic-based breastfeeding peer counseling on breastfeeding rates among low-income patients.以诊所为基础的母乳喂养同伴咨询对低收入患者母乳喂养率的作用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06395-1.
4
Teleintervention's effects on breastfeeding in low-income women in high income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.远程干预对高收入国家低收入妇女母乳喂养的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Apr 13;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00631-2.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of a multicomponent breastfeeding promotion and support intervention in a developing country.发展中国家多成分母乳喂养促进与支持干预措施的成本效益分析。
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 18:2023.11.17.23298704. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.17.23298704.
6
The Effect of Psychological Interventions on the Anxiety and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心理干预对焦虑及母乳喂养自我效能的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Iran J Public Health. 2023 May;52(5):937-949. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12710.
7
Community-based approaches to infant safe sleep and breastfeeding promotion: a qualitative study.基于社区的促进婴儿安全睡眠和母乳喂养方法:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15227-4.
8
A systematic literature review of breastfeeding interventions among Black populations using the RE-AIM framework.采用 RE-AIM 框架对黑人群体中的母乳喂养干预措施进行的系统文献回顾。
Int Breastfeed J. 2022 Dec 17;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00527-z.
9
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
10
How breastfeeding behavior develops in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study based on health belief model in China.中国基于健康信念模式的研究:妊娠期糖尿病女性母乳喂养行为的发展。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 3;13:955484. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.955484. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A quasi-experimental evaluation of a breastfeeding support program for low income women in Michigan.密歇根低收入妇女母乳喂养支持计划的准实验评估。
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Jan;14(1):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0430-5. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
2
Breastfeeding peer counselors in the United States: helping to build a culture and tradition of breastfeeding.美国的母乳喂养同伴咨询师:助力营造母乳喂养的文化与传统。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;52(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.05.006.
3
Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries.发达国家的母乳喂养与母婴健康结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Apr(153):1-186.
4
Early consumption of human milk oligosaccharides is inversely related to subsequent risk of respiratory and enteric disease in infants.早期摄入人乳寡糖与婴儿随后发生呼吸道和肠道疾病的风险呈负相关。
Breastfeed Med. 2006 Winter;1(4):207-15. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2006.1.207.
5
Duration of breastfeeding, daycare, and physician visits among infants 6 months and younger.
Ann Epidemiol. 2003 Jul;13(6):431-5. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(02)00463-5.
6
Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease.乳腺癌与母乳喂养:对来自30个国家的47项流行病学研究的个体数据进行的联合重新分析,其中包括50302名乳腺癌患者和96973名未患该病的女性。
Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):187-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09454-0.
7
Breastfeeding duration, costs, and benefits of a support program for low-income breastfeeding women.低收入母乳喂养女性的母乳喂养时长、支持项目的成本及效益
Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):95-100. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00169.x.
8
Extending breastfeeding duration through primary care: a systematic review of prenatal and postnatal interventions.通过初级保健延长母乳喂养持续时间:产前和产后干预措施的系统评价
J Hum Lact. 2001 Nov;17(4):326-43. doi: 10.1177/089033440101700407.
9
Breastfeeding peer counseling: results from the National WIC Survey.母乳喂养同伴咨询:全国妇女婴儿营养补充计划调查结果
J Hum Lact. 2001 May;17(2):119-25; quiz 132-4, 168. doi: 10.1177/089033440101700205.
10
The breastfeeding support team for low-income, predominantly-minority women: a pilot intervention study.针对低收入、以少数族裔为主的女性的母乳喂养支持团队:一项试点干预研究。
Health Care Women Int. 2001 Jul-Aug;22(5):501-15. doi: 10.1080/073993301317094317.