• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在观察及物动作时,眼球运动具有序列结构。

Eye movements during transitive action observation have sequential structure.

作者信息

Webb Andrew, Knott Alistair, Macaskill Michael R

机构信息

Dept. of Computer Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jan;133(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.09.001
PMID:19854431
Abstract

In this paper, we explore how observers of a reach-to-grasp action can identify and distinguish between the agent and patient (i.e. target) of the action. We investigate the hypothesis that there is a characteristic sequential structure to the observer's pattern of saccades, with the agent being fixated first, and then the target. We report an experiment which indicates that this sequence of saccades, while not ubiquitous, is overwhelmingly more likely than chance. The experiment also sheds some light on the mechanisms which allow the observer to saccade from the agent of the action to the target.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了伸手抓握动作的观察者如何识别并区分该动作的施动者和受动者(即目标)。我们研究了这样一个假设:观察者的眼跳模式存在一种特征性的顺序结构,即先注视施动者,然后注视目标。我们报告了一项实验,该实验表明这种眼跳顺序虽并非普遍存在,但比随机情况出现的可能性要大得多。该实验还对使观察者能够从动作的施动者眼跳到目标的机制有所揭示。

相似文献

1
Eye movements during transitive action observation have sequential structure.在观察及物动作时,眼球运动具有序列结构。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jan;133(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
2
Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.儿童和成人的混合正扫视和反扫视表现。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 19;1255:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
3
Impaired temporal prediction and eye-hand coordination in patients with cerebellar lesions.小脑病变患者的时间预测和眼手协调受损。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 May 7;160(1):72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.020. Epub 2004 Dec 21.
4
Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.场景上下文在视觉搜索过程中引导眼球运动。
Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(5):614-21. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.025. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
5
The development of the spatial extent of oculomotor inhibition.动眼抑制空间范围的发展。
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 17;1298:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.081. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
6
Perception of visual space at the time of pro- and anti-saccades.同向和反向扫视时的视觉空间感知。
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2457-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.00821.2003. Epub 2004 Feb 18.
7
Simultaneous processing of visual information and planning of hand movements in a visuo-manual search task.在视觉手动搜索任务中视觉信息的同时处理与手部动作规划。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
8
Problems in the coupling of eye and hand in the sequential movements of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.发育协调障碍儿童连续动作中眼手协调的问题。
Child Care Health Dev. 2006 Nov;32(6):665-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00678.x.
9
Relations among visual strategies, force fluctuations, and attention during a force-matching task.在力量匹配任务中视觉策略、力波动和注意力之间的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Dec;117(3):775-800. doi: 10.2466/22.24.PMS.117x29z6.
10
Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements.扫视眼动的认知控制
Brain Cogn. 2008 Dec;68(3):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Asymmetries in encoding event roles: Evidence from language and cognition.事件角色编码的不对称性:来自语言和认知的证据。
Cognition. 2024 Sep;250:105868. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105868. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
The use of gaze to study cognition: limitations, solutions, and applications to animal welfare.利用注视来研究认知:局限性、解决方案及在动物福利中的应用
Front Psychol. 2023 May 2;14:1147278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1147278. eCollection 2023.
3
Subjects are not all alike: Eye-tracking the agent preference in Spanish.主体并非千篇一律:西班牙语中追踪眼球以了解主体对代理人的偏好
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0272211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272211. eCollection 2022.
4
The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.句法的进化起源:非人类灵长类动物的事件认知。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabn8464. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8464. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.言语规划中句法差异的神经特征。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Jan 26;19(1):e3001038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001038. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Event Perception and Memory.事件感知和记忆。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:165-191. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051101.
7
How Children and Adults Encode Causative Events Cross-Linguistically: Implications for Language Production and Attention.儿童和成人如何跨语言编码因果事件:对语言产生和注意力的影响
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(8):1015-1037. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1175649. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Not so secret agents: Event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension.并非隐秘的特工:视觉事件理解中语义角色的事件相关电位
Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
9
Different but complementary roles of action and gaze in action observation priming: Insights from eye- and motion-tracking measures.动作与注视在动作观察启动中的不同但互补的作用:来自眼动和运动追踪测量的见解
Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00569. eCollection 2015.
10
Congruency of gaze metrics in action, imagery and action observation.行动、意象和行动观察中注视指标的一致性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 24;7:604. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00604.