• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道前列腺切除术与微创治疗良性前列腺梗阻的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.

机构信息

Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.015
PMID:19854492
Abstract

Emerging minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of patients with benign prostatic obstruction may have advantages over transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized trials published upto April 2008 comparing TURP with photoselective vaporization, holmium laser ablation, and bipolar TURP. A total of 38 articles reporting results from 21 trials were included (photoselective vaporization = 3; holmium laser ablation = 1; bipolar TURP = 17). An assessment of perioperative and postoperative outcomes up to 12 months indicates benefits for these procedures. However, long-term follow-up and stronger methodological quality of the evidence is required to assess the long-term durability of the technologies.

摘要

新兴的微创治疗良性前列腺梗阻的方法可能优于经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)。我们对截至 2008 年 4 月发表的比较 TURP 与光选择性汽化、钬激光消融和双极 TURP 的随机试验进行了系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析。共有 38 篇文章报道了 21 项试验的结果(光选择性汽化=3;钬激光消融=1;双极 TURP=17)。对 12 个月内围手术期和术后结果的评估表明,这些方法具有优势。然而,需要长期随访和更高质量的证据来评估这些技术的长期耐久性。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.经尿道前列腺切除术与微创治疗良性前列腺梗阻的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
2
Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis.男性良性前列腺增生症下尿路症状的微创治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 15;7(7):CD013656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013656.pub2.
3
Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生症男性下尿路症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012867.pub3.
4
Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD004135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004135.pub2.
5
Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.微创治疗良性前列腺梗阻:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jun;83(6):534-547. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.028. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement.对良性前列腺增生男性手术治疗的有效性和成本效用进行系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Nov;12(35):iii, ix-x, 1-146, 169-515. doi: 10.3310/hta12350.
7
Laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic obstruction.良性前列腺梗阻的激光前列腺切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2000(1):CD001987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001987.pub2.
8
Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis.良性前列腺增生的微创治疗:Cochrane 网络荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2022 Aug;130(2):142-156. doi: 10.1111/bju.15653. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
Non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial on the effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to prostatic artery embolisation in reducing severe lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: study protocol for the TUMT-PAE-1 trial.经尿道微波热疗与前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生症患者严重下尿路症状的非劣效性、随机、开放标签临床试验:TUMT-PAE-1 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08409-x.
10
A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.钬激光前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的系统评价
J Urol. 2004 May;171(5):1773-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113494.03668.6d.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with and without upper urinary tract dilatation: a propensity score matching analysis.良性前列腺增生伴或不伴上尿路扩张患者经尿道前列腺切除术的比较结果:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Prostate Int. 2025 Jun;13(2):116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Transurethral resection of the prostate across continents: a meta-analysis evaluating quality of gold standard in the twenty-first century.跨大洲经尿道前列腺切除术:一项评估21世纪金标准质量的荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Jan 24;43(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05439-7.
3
Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
评估经尿道前列腺切除术二十年:系统评价和随机临床试验荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 15;42(1):639. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05332-3.
4
Correlation of Postoperative Outcomes According to the Amount of Prostatic Tissue Removed in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.经尿道前列腺切除术患者术后结局与切除前列腺组织量的相关性
Cureus. 2023 Jan 31;15(1):e34451. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34451. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Incidence of urethral stricture following bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: A single-center study.双极经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄的发生率:一项单中心研究。
Indian J Urol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):146-150. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_228_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: Are they often underreported? A single-center retrospective observational cohort study.经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄:它们是否经常报告不足?一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究。
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):329-335. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_165_19. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Outcomes and Complications of Bipolar vs. Monopolar Energy for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.双极与单极能量用于经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的结果与并发症:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 2;8:583806. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.583806. eCollection 2021.
8
Reprint - Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review.转载 - 双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻继发下尿路症状:Cochrane系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Dec;14(12):423-430. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6464.
9
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻继发的下尿路症状
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 3;12(12):CD009629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub4.
10
Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes.前瞻性随机研究比较良性前列腺梗阻中经尿道前列腺切除术的单极与双极:36 个月的结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1595-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2023-7. Epub 2017 Feb 27.