Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;30(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21964.
To assess the feasibility and the quality of abdominal three-dimensional (3D) contrast enhanced MR angiograms acquired at 3.0 Tesla (T) using a new 2D-accelerated autocalibrating parallel reconstruction method for Cartesian sampling (2D-ARC).
With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, a prospective trial in 6 normal healthy volunteers and 23 patients referred for evaluation of suspected renovascular disease was performed. The volunteers underwent abdominal MRA with and without 2D-ARC acceleration. Images were evaluated independently by two blinded vascular radiologists in randomized order. Vessel conspicuity was rated on a five-point scale. Evaluation for significant differences between the scores for each technique was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
In the series of six volunteers, no statistical significance was found between the image quality scores for 2D-ARC accelerated and nonaccelerated exams. A high proportion of the 23 clinical 2D-ARC exams were graded as diagnostic (vessel conspicuity score >or=2; Reader 1, 96%; Reader 2, 100%) for overall image quality.
Subjective image quality of 2D-ARC accelerated MRA was equivalent to the conventional MRA method. However, the 2D-ARC accelerated sequence provided a 3.5-fold increase in imaging volume, complete abdominal coverage, and a 30% reduction in voxel volume, all within the same acquisition time.
评估在 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪上使用二维加速自校准并行采集重建方法(2D-ARC)获得的腹部三维(3D)对比增强磁共振血管造影的可行性和质量。
在机构审查委员会批准和书面知情同意的情况下,对 6 名正常健康志愿者和 23 名疑似肾血管疾病的患者进行前瞻性试验。志愿者接受了腹部 MRA 检查,包括使用和不使用 2D-ARC 加速。图像由两位独立的血管放射科医生以随机顺序进行盲法评估。血管显影的评分采用五分制。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估两种技术评分之间的显著差异。
在 6 名志愿者的系列中,使用和不使用 2D-ARC 加速的图像质量评分之间没有统计学意义。23 例临床 2D-ARC 检查中有很大比例被评为诊断性(血管显影评分>或=2;Reader 1,96%;Reader 2,100%),整体图像质量良好。
2D-ARC 加速 MRA 的主观图像质量与常规 MRA 方法相当。然而,2D-ARC 加速序列在相同的采集时间内提供了 3.5 倍的成像体积增加、完整的腹部覆盖和 30%的体素体积减少。