• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与各外科重症监护病房住院时间的相关性。

Correlation of APACHE II and SOFA scores with length of stay in various surgical intensive care units.

作者信息

Milić Morena, Goranović Tatjana, Holjevac Jadranka Katancić

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital "Dubrava", Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2009 Sep;33(3):831-5.

PMID:19860111
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score as the predictors of length of stay (LOS) in various surgical intensive care units (ICUs) and to test the hypothesis that the significance of scoring for predicting LOS is greater in specialized surgical ICUs. We scored patients in a non-specialized general surgical ICU (n = 328) and in a specialized cardiosurgical ICU (n = 158) consecutively on admission (APACHE II-1st day; SOFA-1st day) and on third day of stay (APACHE II-3rd day; SOFA-3rd day) in a 4-month period. LOS and APACHE II/SOFA scores were significantly correlated both on admission and on third day of stay in the general surgical ICU (APACHE II-1st day r = 0.289; SOFA-1st day r = 0.306; APACHE II-3rd day r = 0.728; SOFA-3rd day r = 0.725). LOS and APACHE II on admission were not significantly correlated in the cardiosurgical ICU (APACHE II-1st day r = 0.092), while SOFA on admission and APACHE II and SOFA on third day were significantly correlated (SOFA-1st day r = 0.258; APACHE II-3rd day r = 0.716; SOFA-3rd day r = 0.719). Usefulness of scoring for predicting LOS in ICU varied between different surgical ICUs. Contrary to our hypothesis, scoring had greater value for predicting LOS in the non-specialized general surgical ICU. APACHE II score on admission had no value for predicting LOS in the cardiosurgical ICU.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分作为各外科重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)预测指标的有效性,并检验以下假设:在专科外科ICU中,评分对预测LOS的意义更大。在4个月的时间里,我们连续对非专科普通外科ICU(n = 328)和专科心脏外科ICU(n = 158)的患者在入院时(APACHE II第1天;SOFA第1天)以及住院第3天(APACHE II第3天;SOFA第3天)进行评分。在普通外科ICU,入院时和住院第3天的LOS与APACHE II/SOFA评分均显著相关(APACHE II第1天r = 0.289;SOFA第1天r = 0.306;APACHE II第3天r = 0.728;SOFA第3天r = 0.725)。在心脏外科ICU,入院时LOS与APACHE II无显著相关性(APACHE II第1天r = 0.092),而入院时SOFA以及第3天的APACHE II和SOFA均显著相关(SOFA第1天r = 0.258;APACHE II第3天r = 0.716;SOFA第3天r = 0.719)。不同外科ICU中评分对预测LOS的有效性各不相同。与我们的假设相反,在非专科普通外科ICU中,评分对预测LOS的价值更大。入院时APACHE II评分对心脏外科ICU的LOS预测无价值。

相似文献

1
Correlation of APACHE II and SOFA scores with length of stay in various surgical intensive care units.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与各外科重症监护病房住院时间的相关性。
Coll Antropol. 2009 Sep;33(3):831-5.
2
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
3
Value of APACHE II, SOFA and CPIS scores in predicting prognosis in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)及临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)在预测呼吸机相关性肺炎患者预后中的价值。
Respiration. 2006;73(4):503-8. doi: 10.1159/000088708. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
4
Application of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to bacteremic ICU patients.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在菌血症重症监护病房患者中的应用。
Infection. 2007 Jun;35(4):240-4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6217-6. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
5
Serial evaluation of the MODS, SOFA and LOD scores to predict ICU mortality in mixed critically ill patients.对多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和乳酸清除率(LOD)评分进行连续评估,以预测混合危重症患者的重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Sep;91(9):1336-42.
6
Serum osmolality and outcome in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者的血清渗透压与预后
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):970-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01096.x.
7
[Correlation of a computerized SOFA score and derived measures with length of stay at an operative ICU].[计算机化序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分及衍生指标与手术重症监护病房住院时间的相关性]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2003 Jun;38(6):397-402. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39358.
8
Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients.比较序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 和创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法在预测 ICU 创伤患者结局中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
9
TISS 28 or SOFA: good predicting factors for admission in a surgical intensive care unit longer than 24 hours.TISS 28评分或序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA):入住外科重症监护病房超过24小时的良好预测因素。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 May;89(5):648-56.
10
C-reactive protein correlates to functional score systems of patients in general surgical intensive care unit.C反应蛋白与普通外科重症监护病房患者的功能评分系统相关。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016 Jan-Mar;30(1):147-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive performance of SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19 of referral center in the north of Iran a retrospective study.伊朗北部转诊中心新冠病毒病(COVID-19)重症监护病房(ICU)患者中序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)对院内死亡率的预测性能:一项回顾性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 22;85(11):5414-5419. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001304. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Effect of sarcopenia on postoperative ICU admission and length of stay after hepatic resection for Klatskin tumor.肌肉减少症对肝门部胆管癌肝切除术后入住重症监护病房及住院时间的影响。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 9;13:1136376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1136376. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of risk scoring systems for critical care patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predicting mortality and length of stay.比较危重症上消化道出血患者的风险评分系统:预测死亡率和住院时间。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(4):310-314. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.120741.
4
Vitamin C Therapy for Routine Care in Septic Shock (ViCTOR) Trial: Effect of Intravenous Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Hydrocortisone Administration on Inpatient Mortality among Patients with Septic Shock.脓毒症休克常规治疗中的维生素C疗法(ViCTOR)试验:静脉注射维生素C、硫胺素和氢化可的松对脓毒症休克患者住院死亡率的影响。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;24(8):653-661. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23517.
5
An Overview of the Predictor Standard Tools for Patient Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation.机械通气患者撤机预测标准工具概述
Electron Physician. 2016 Feb 25;8(2):1955-63. doi: 10.19082/1955. eCollection 2016 Feb.
6
Evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scoring systems for prognostication of outcomes among Intensive Care Unit's patients.评估急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II及序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统对重症监护病房患者预后的预测价值。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):168-73. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.168817.