University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;15(10):1547-55. doi: 10.3201/eid1510.081129.
Prophylaxis with neuraminidase inhibitors is important for controlling seasonal influenza outbreaks in long-term care settings. We used a stochastic individual-based model that simulates influenza virus transmission in a long-term care nursing home department to study the protection offered to patients by different strategies of prophylaxis with oseltamivir and determined the effect of emerging resistance. Without resistance, postexposure and continuous prophylaxis reduced the patient infection attack rate from 0.19 to 0.13 (relative risk [RR] 0.67) and 0.05 (RR 0.23), respectively. Postexposure prophylaxis prevented more infections per dose (118 and 323 daily doses needed to prevent 1 infection, respectively) and required fewer doses per season than continuous prophylaxis. If resistance to oseltamivir was increased, both prophylaxis strategies became less efficacious and efficient, but postexposure prophylaxis posed a lower selection pressure for resistant virus strains. Extension of prophylaxis to healthcare workers offered little additional protection to patients.
神经氨酸酶抑制剂预防对于控制长期护理环境中的季节性流感爆发非常重要。我们使用了一种随机的个体基础模型来模拟长期护理养老院部门中的流感病毒传播,以研究奥司他韦不同预防策略为患者提供的保护,并确定新出现的耐药性的影响。没有耐药性的情况下,暴露后预防和连续预防将患者感染的攻击率从 0.19 降低到 0.13(相对风险 [RR] 0.67)和 0.05(RR 0.23)。暴露后预防每剂量预防更多感染(分别需要 118 和 323 个每日剂量来预防 1 次感染),且每季节所需剂量少于连续预防。如果奥司他韦的耐药性增加,两种预防策略的效果和效率都会降低,但暴露后预防对耐药病毒株的选择压力较低。将预防措施扩展到医护人员对患者提供的额外保护作用不大。