Oliveira Ema, Almeida Leandro, Ferrándiz Carmen, Ferrando Mercedes, Sainz Marta, Prieto María Dolores
Universidad Beira Interior, Portugal.
Psicothema. 2009 Nov;21(4):562-7.
The aim of this work is to study the unidimensional and multidimensional nature of creativity when assessed through divergent thinking tasks, as proposed in Torrance's battery (Torrance Creative Thinking Test, TTCT). This battery is made up of various tasks with verbal and figurative content, aimed at estimating the level of creativity according to the dimensions or cognitive functions of fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration of the individuals' ideas. This work used a sample of 595 Portuguese students from 5th and 6th grade. The results of confirmatory factor analysis reveals that the unidimensional model (a general factor of creativity) and the model of factors as a function of the cognitive dimensions of creativity, based on task content, do not fit well. The model with the best fit has a hierarchical factor structure, in which the first level comprises the factors for each of the subtests applied and the second level includes verbal or figurative content. The difficulty to verify the structural validity of the TTCT is noted, and the need for further studies to achieve, in practice, better individual creativity scores.
本研究旨在探讨如托兰斯测验(托兰斯创造性思维测验,TTCT)中所提出的,通过发散性思维任务评估创造力时的单维度和多维度特性。该测验由各种具有言语和形象内容的任务组成,旨在根据流畅性、灵活性、独创性和个体想法的详尽性等维度或认知功能来估计创造力水平。本研究以595名葡萄牙五、六年级学生为样本。验证性因素分析结果表明,单维度模型(创造力的一般因素)以及基于任务内容、将因素作为创造力认知维度函数的模型,拟合效果不佳。拟合度最佳的模型具有层次因素结构,其中第一层次包括所应用的每个子测验的因素,第二层次包括言语或形象内容。研究指出了验证TTCT结构效度的困难,以及在实践中需要进一步研究以获得更好的个体创造力分数。