• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在因发生器更换或导联修订而无感染迹象的植入式心脏转复除颤器患者中,发生器囊中细菌定植的流行情况。

Prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients without signs of infection undergoing generator replacement or lead revision.

机构信息

Cardiac Arrhythmia Center at the Heart Center of Ludwigshafen, Bremserstrasse 79, Ludwigshafen D-67063, Germany.

出版信息

Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):58-63. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup334.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eup334
PMID:19861383
Abstract

AIMS

This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients without signs of infection and to analyse the impact of bacterial colonization on the incidence of device infection during follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 122 ICD patients undergoing generator replacement or surgical lead revision between January 2006 and July 2008, microbiological cultures of generator pockets and extracted leads were consecutively obtained. Patients with clinical evidence of a device infection were excluded. Positive cultures from the generator pocket and leads were found in 40 (33%) patients. The most common bacteria isolated were coagulase negative staphylococci (68%). During a median follow-up time of 203 days after the revision device infection occurred in three [7.5%, confidence interval (CI) 1.6-20.4%] patients with a positive culture vs. two (2.4%, CI 0.3-8.5%) patients with a negative culture (P = 0.33). Time from revision to infection was 108 +/- 73 days in patients with positive culture vs. 60 +/- 39 days in patients with negative culture (P = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

A third of ICD patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision have an asymptomatic bacterial colonization of generator pockets. After revision 7.5% of these patients develop a device infection with the same species of microorganism.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估无感染迹象的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者发生器袋细菌定植的发生率,并分析细菌定植对随访期间器械感染发生率的影响。

方法和结果

在 2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 7 月期间接受发生器更换或外科导线修正的 122 例 ICD 患者中,连续获得发生器袋和提取导线的微生物培养物。排除有器械感染临床证据的患者。在 40 例(33%)患者的发生器袋和导线上发现了阳性培养物。分离出的最常见细菌是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(68%)。在修正后中位随访 203 天期间,3 例(7.5%,置信区间 [CI] 1.6-20.4%)阳性培养患者发生感染,2 例(2.4%,CI 0.3-8.5%)阴性培养患者发生感染(P = 0.33)。阳性培养患者的感染时间为 108 +/- 73 天,阴性培养患者的感染时间为 60 +/- 39 天(P = 0.50)。

结论

三分之一接受发生器更换或导线修正的 ICD 患者发生器袋存在无症状细菌定植。修正后,这些患者中有 7.5%发生了与相同微生物种类的器械感染。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients without signs of infection undergoing generator replacement or lead revision.在因发生器更换或导联修订而无感染迹象的植入式心脏转复除颤器患者中,发生器囊中细菌定植的流行情况。
Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):58-63. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup334.
2
Positive cultures in asymptomatic patients during elective device replacement: a murderer hides in the darkness or an innocent person on the crime scene?
Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):5-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup402.
3
Lead-Dependent Infective Endocarditis: The Role of Factors Predisposing to Its Development in an Analysis of 414 Clinical Cases.铅依赖型感染性心内膜炎:在414例临床病例分析中易患因素对其发病的作用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):846-56. doi: 10.1111/pace.12615. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Complications leading to surgical revision in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: comparison of patients with single-chamber, dual-chamber, and biventricular devices.导致植入式心脏复律除颤器患者进行手术翻修的并发症:单腔、双腔和双心室装置患者的比较。
Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):297-302. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun322. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
5
Complications associated with generator replacement in response to device advisories.因设备警示而进行发生器更换所带来的并发症。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01047.x. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
6
Pulse Generator Exchange Does Not Accelerate the Rate of Electrical Failure in a Recalled Small Caliber ICD Lead.更换脉冲发生器并不会加快已召回的小口径植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线的电气故障发生率。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;38(12):1434-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12734. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
7
IMpact of pocKet rEvision on the rate of InfecTion and other CompLications in patients rEquiring pocket mAnipulation for generator replacement and/or lead replacement or revisioN (MAKE IT CLEAN): A prospective randomized study.针对因更换发生器和/或更换导线或进行修复而需要进行囊袋操作的患者,囊袋修复对感染率及其他并发症的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究
Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
8
Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections.永久性起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器感染的管理与预后
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 8;49(18):1851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
9
High prevalence of asymptomatic bacterial colonization of rhythm management devices.节律管理设备无症状细菌定植的高发生率。
Europace. 2008 Sep;10(9):1067-72. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun191. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
10
Biventricular defibrillator patients have higher complication rates after revision of recalled leads.双心室除颤器患者在召回导线修复后并发症发生率更高。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03401.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Iodinated Adhesive Drapes for Repeat Cardiac Implantable Device Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于重复心脏植入式设备植入的碘化粘贴巾:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2835.
2
Preclinical evaluation of a novel antibiotic-eluting BioEnvelope for CIED infection prevention.一种用于预防心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染的新型抗生素洗脱生物包膜的临床前评估。
Front Drug Deliv. 2024 Sep 10;4:1441956. doi: 10.3389/fddev.2024.1441956. eCollection 2024.
3
The effect of an antibacterial envelope on cardiac implantable device-related infection - A real-world analysis from a tertiary center.
抗菌包膜对心脏植入式设备相关感染的影响——来自三级中心的真实世界分析。
Cardiol J. 2025;32(3):301-307. doi: 10.5603/cj.100458. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
4
Usefulness of sonication in the microbiological diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.超声处理在心血管植入式电子设备感染的微生物学诊断中的应用:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Nov 5;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00753-9.
5
Measures to Prevent Infection in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacements or Upgrades.心脏植入式电子设备更换或升级中的感染预防措施。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 10;25(1):19. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501019. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Clinical impact of capsulectomy during cardiac implantable electronic device generator replacement: a prospective randomized trial.心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)更换术中行囊袋切除术的临床影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;67(5):1211-1217. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01765-3. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
7
Do barrier dressings reduce cardiac implantable device infection: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (BARRIER-PROTECT).屏障敷料能否降低心脏植入式设备感染率:一项随机对照试验(BARRIER-PROTECT)的方案
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 10;9(12):e22229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22229. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Rehabilitation of an existing device implant pocket using a biologic extracellular matrix envelope.使用生物细胞外基质包膜对现有设备植入袋进行修复。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023 Aug 22;9(11):797-799. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.08.007. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Use of a taurolidine containing antimicrobial wash to reduce cardiac implantable electronic device infection.使用含牛磺罗定的抗菌洗液可减少心脏植入式电子设备感染。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad306.
10
The European TauroPace™ Registry.欧洲TauroPace™注册研究。
Methods Protoc. 2023 Sep 15;6(5):86. doi: 10.3390/mps6050086.