• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别、家庭状况和种族对判决决定的影响。

The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions.

机构信息

Department of Criminal Justice, University ofWisconsin-Milwaukee, 53201, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):378-95. doi: 10.1002/bsl.901.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.901
PMID:19862840
Abstract

This study sought to determine the effects of family role, gender, and race on judges' sentencing decisions. To assess these effects, factorial surveys were sent to 360 Court of Common Plea judges who presided over criminal court cases in the state. Survey administration resulted in a 51% response rate. The findings indicate that defendants who were depicted as performing caretaker roles had a significantly decreased likelihood of incarceration. Further analysis found that the reduction in likelihood of incarceration for being a caretaker was larger for males than for females. Examination of the interaction of familial role with race found that familial role equally reduced the likelihood of incarceration for black and white females. Familial responsibility, however, resulted in a significantly greater decrease in likelihood of incarceration for black men than for white men.

摘要

本研究旨在确定家庭角色、性别和种族对法官量刑决策的影响。为了评估这些影响,向在该州刑事法庭审理案件的 360 名普通法法院法官发送了因素调查。调查管理的回复率为 51%。调查结果表明,被描述为承担照顾者角色的被告被监禁的可能性显著降低。进一步的分析发现,作为照顾者,男性被监禁的可能性降低幅度大于女性。对家庭角色与种族的相互作用的检查发现,家庭角色同样降低了黑人和白人女性被监禁的可能性。然而,家庭责任导致黑人男性被监禁的可能性比白人男性显著降低。

相似文献

1
The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions.性别、家庭状况和种族对判决决定的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):378-95. doi: 10.1002/bsl.901.
2
Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.风险评估对法官量刑相对贫困被告公正性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;44(1):51-59. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000360. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
3
Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania.道德直觉是否会影响法官的量刑决策?宾夕法尼亚州刑事法庭量刑的多层次研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Sep;115:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102927. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law: offending patterns and sentencing outcomes.刑法框架下的老年男性与老年女性:犯罪模式与量刑结果
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 May;55(3):S141-51. doi: 10.1093/geronb/55.3.s141.
5
Bio-behavioral scientific evidence alters judges' sentencing decision-making: A quantitative analysis.生物-行为科学证据改变法官的量刑决策:定量分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 Jul-Aug;95:102007. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102007. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
6
Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.对家庭暴力的认知与模拟陪审员的量刑决定。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Dec;22(12):1515-35. doi: 10.1177/0886260507306476.
7
Drug court as an alternative to incarceration.药物法庭作为监禁的替代方式。
Med Health R I. 2007 May;90(5):154-6.
8
The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.审判税与刑事法庭判决中种族/民族、性别和年龄的交叉。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Feb;47(1):201-216. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000514.
9
The court for sexual offences: perceptions of the perpetrators of sexual offences.性犯罪法庭:对性犯罪者的认知
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;29(4):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.04.007. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
10
The Role of Academic Public Health in Reducing Incarceration.学术公共卫生在减少监禁方面的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(S1):S16-S17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305265.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias in Sentencing Men for Sexual Offenses Against Minors: Male Victims Bring More Punitive Sentences Than Female Victims.对性侵未成年人男性罪犯量刑中的偏见:男性受害者比女性受害者面临更严厉的刑罚。
Behav Sci Law. 2025 Jul-Aug;43(4):385-400. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2720. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
The challenges of being imperfect: how do judges and prosecutors deal with sentencing disparity.不完美带来的挑战:法官和检察官如何应对量刑差异。
Front Sociol. 2024 Dec 5;9:1488786. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1488786. eCollection 2024.
3
The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case.
被告性别与创伤后应激障碍诊断在受虐配偶案件中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Mar;40(5-6):1112-1134. doi: 10.1177/08862605241257594. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
4
Does Having a Minor Child Affect Criminal Charges and Sanctions Imposed on Female Defendants?有未成年子女会影响对女性被告的刑事指控和制裁吗?
Women Crim Justice. 2021;31(2):108-129. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2019.1688222. Epub 2019 Nov 15.