Rolfe Shawn M, Rind Bruce, Hubbard Thomas K
William A. Percy Foundation for Social and Historical Studies, Chico, California, USA.
Boston University - School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2025 Jul-Aug;43(4):385-400. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2720. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
Prior theoretical and empirical research examining the influence of sex on sentencing has been primarily concerned with the sex of the offender, as opposed to the victim. The present study drew on a convenience sample of males (n = 1190) in state and federal correctional facilities across the country, examining minimum sentences in relation to crime type. The analysis focused on individuals convicted of contact or enticement sexual offenses against minors (n = 380), finding that adult male offenders were sentenced to longer sentences when involved with male versus female victims. When victims were aged 14-17, male victims yielded a median minimum sentence of 30 years, twice that for female victims (15 years). For younger age groups, the difference narrowed. These findings suggest that prejudicial sentencing is not limited to race/ethnicity but also includes sexual orientation. Future research should continue to examine victim sex in sex offense punishment. Policy implications are discussed.
先前有关性别对量刑影响的理论和实证研究主要关注的是犯罪者的性别,而非受害者的性别。本研究采用了一个便利样本,选取了全国各州和联邦惩教机构中的男性(n = 1190),考察了与犯罪类型相关的最低刑期。分析聚焦于因针对未成年人的接触性或诱发性性犯罪而被定罪的个体(n = 380),发现成年男性犯罪者在涉及男性受害者时比涉及女性受害者时被判处的刑期更长。当受害者年龄在14至17岁之间时,男性受害者的最低刑期中位数为30年,是女性受害者(15年)的两倍。对于年龄较小的群体,这种差异有所缩小。这些发现表明,偏见性量刑不仅限于种族/族裔,还包括性取向。未来的研究应继续考察性犯罪惩罚中受害者的性别。文中还讨论了政策含义。