• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄罗斯药品福利货币化的微观数据评估

Micro data assessment of Russian drug benefit monetization.

机构信息

Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(5):465-76. doi: 10.1108/14777260910983970.

DOI:10.1108/14777260910983970
PMID:19862876
Abstract

PURPOSE

The drug benefit reform implemented in Russia in 2005 allowed benefit groups to choose between the fixed monetary compensation or the in-kind benefits. This paper seeks to study the efficiency of the in-kind drug benefit system before and after the reform by comparing mandated groups of monetary savings within each of the schemes.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Pair-wise correlation analysis using the Federal Social Insurance Fund benefit groups database (85 regions in 2005-2006) and two representative consumer expenditure surveys: the National Assessment of Population Welfare and Participation in Social Programs: NOBUS (47 regions, over 40,000 households, 2003) and the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey: RLMS (32 regions, over 4000 households, 2003).

FINDINGS

The paper finds that giving the mandated population a choice between the two schemes led to an increase in demand for drugs and adverse selection within the in-kind drug provision system.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The Federal Social Insurance Fund aggregated data allow one to make post-reform estimations only for an average representative of a certain benefit group. Employing micro data on both pre- and post-reform consumer behavior would become a tool for more precise econometric analysis.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The results of the correlation analysis demonstrate an imbalance in the solidarity principle and the need for introducing health and drug insurance mechanisms in the Russian drug benefit programme.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper represents an attempt to use a large sample statistical analysis along with the Federal Social Insurance Fund data in order to assess drug benefit groups of behavior in Russian regions before and after the drug benefit reform.

摘要

目的

2005 年俄罗斯实施的药品福利改革允许受益群体在固定货币补偿或实物福利之间进行选择。本文旨在通过比较每个方案中规定的货币节省强制性群体,来研究改革前后实物药品福利制度的效率。

设计/方法/途径:使用联邦社会保险基金福利群体数据库(2005-2006 年的 85 个地区)和两个有代表性的消费者支出调查:国家人口福利和参与社会计划评估:NOBUS(47 个地区,超过 40000 户家庭,2003 年)和俄罗斯纵向监测调查:RLMS(32 个地区,超过 4000 户家庭,2003 年)进行成对相关分析。

发现

本文发现,让强制性人口在两种方案之间进行选择,导致对药品的需求增加,并在实物药品供应系统中出现逆向选择。

研究局限性/影响:联邦社会保险基金汇总数据仅允许对特定福利群体的平均代表进行改革后估计。使用改革前后消费者行为的微观数据将成为更精确的计量经济学分析的工具。

实际意义

相关分析的结果表明,团结原则存在不平衡,俄罗斯药品福利计划需要引入健康和药品保险机制。

原创性/价值:本文代表了一种尝试,即使用大样本统计分析以及联邦社会保险基金数据,以评估俄罗斯地区药品福利改革前后药品福利群体的行为。

相似文献

1
Micro data assessment of Russian drug benefit monetization.俄罗斯药品福利货币化的微观数据评估
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(5):465-76. doi: 10.1108/14777260910983970.
2
Reforming voluntary drug insurance in Russian healthcare: does social solidarity matter?俄罗斯医疗保健中自愿药物保险的改革:社会团结重要吗?
Health Policy. 2017 Nov;121(11):1177-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
4
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.PDP 还是 MA-PD?CMS 第 25 区的医疗保险部分 D 注册决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
5
Urban health insurance reform and coverage in China using data from National Health Services Surveys in 1998 and 2003.利用1998年和2003年国家卫生服务调查数据对中国城市医疗保险改革与覆盖情况的研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Mar 3;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-37.
6
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
7
Medical care use and selection in a social health insurance with an equalization fund: evidence from Colombia.设有均衡基金的社会医疗保险中的医疗服务利用与选择:来自哥伦比亚的证据
Health Econ. 2003 Mar;12(3):231-46. doi: 10.1002/hec.711.
8
Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: Medicare Part D.药品和医疗器械:医疗保险D部分。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Jan 3:1-37.
9
Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药费用分担的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
10
Dual choice health insurance policy: a proposal and a cost analysis.双重选择健康保险政策:一项提议及成本分析。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):60-70.